Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2021 Sep;28(9):5039-5047.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09591-x. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Survival of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiotherapy versus Total Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer

Hakyoung Kim  1 , Sae Byul Lee  2 , Seok-Jin Nam  3 , Eun Sook Lee  4 , Byeong-Woo Park  5 , Ho Yong Park  6 , Hyouk Jin Lee  7 , Jisun Kim  1 , Yong Chung  1 , Hee Jeong Kim  1 , Beom Seok Ko  1 , Jong Won Lee  1 , Byung Ho Son  1 , Sei Hyun Ahn  1
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Survival of Breast-Conserving Surgery Plus Radiotherapy versus Total Mastectomy in Early Breast Cancer

Hakyoung Kim et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has been reported to have better survival rates when compared with total mastectomy (TM) in early breast cancer. We evaluated the long-term outcomes of Korean women with early breast cancer who underwent either BCS plus radiotherapy (RT) or TM.

Methods: In this population-based study, we evaluated 45,770 patients from the Korean Breast Cancer Registry (KBCR) who were diagnosed with early breast cancer, and divided them into the BCS + RT and TM groups. To minimize bias caused by factors other than the surgical method, we used exact match pairing of prognostic factors. We compared the 10-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) before and after exact matching. As the KBCR is a multicenter, online-based registry program, we used the Asan Medical Center (AMC) database, a single-center database, to validate the results from the KBCR database.

Results: In both the KBCR and AMC cohorts, the BCS + RT group showed better OS and BCSS than the TM group, before and after exact matching. For the KBCR cohort after exact matching, the hazard ratios for OS and BCSS were 1.541 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.392-1.707, p < 0.001) and 1.405 (95% CI 1.183-1.668, p < 0.001), respectively, favoring the BCS + RT group. For the AMC cohort after exact matching, the hazard ratios for OS and BCSS were 1.854 (95% CI 1.476-2.328, p < 0.001) and 1.807 (95% CI 1.186-2.752, p = 0.006), respectively.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that BCS + RT is at least equivalent to TM in terms of OS and may affect treatment decisions in early breast cancer patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1227–32. - DOI
    1. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(16):1233–41. - DOI
    1. van Maaren MC, de Munck L, de Bock GH, et al. 10 year survival after breast-conserving surgery plus radiotherapy compared with mastectomy in early breast cancer in the Netherlands: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(8):1158–70. - DOI
    1. Lagendijk M, van Maaren MC, Saadatmand S, et al. Breast conserving therapy and mastectomy revisited: breast cancer-specific survival and the influence of prognostic factors in 129,692 patients. Int J Cancer. 2018;142(1):165–75. - DOI
    1. Gentilini OD, Cardoso MJ, Poortmans P. Less is more. Breast conservation might be even better than mastectomy in early breast cancer patients. Breast. 2017;35:32–3. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources