Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug;43(8):3005-3025.
doi: 10.1007/s10653-021-00808-2. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Arsenic toxicity in livestock growing in arsenic endemic and control sites of West Bengal: risk for human and environment

Affiliations

Arsenic toxicity in livestock growing in arsenic endemic and control sites of West Bengal: risk for human and environment

Antara Das et al. Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

The present study aims to estimate geochemical arsenic toxicity in the domestic livestock and possible risk for human and environment caused by them. Daily dietary arsenic intake of an exposed adult cow or bull is nearly 4.56 times higher than control populace and about 3.65 times higher than exposed goats. Arsenic toxicity is well exhibited in all the biomarkers through different statistical interpretations. Arsenic bioconcentration is faster through water compared to paddy straw and mostly manifested in faeces and tail hair in cattle. Cow dung and tail hair are the most pronounced pathways of arsenic biotransformation into environment. A considerable amount of arsenic has been observed in animal proteins such as cow milk, boiled egg yolk, albumen, liver and meat from the exposed livestock. Cow milk arsenic is mostly accumulated in casein (83%) due to the presence of phosphoserine units. SAMOE-risk thermometer, calculated for the most regularly consumed foodstuffs in the area, shows the human health risk in a distinct order: drinking water > rice grain > cow milk > chicken > egg > mutton ranging from class 5 to 1. USEPA health risk assessment model reveals more risk in adults than in children, subsisting severe cancer risk from the foodstuffs where the edible animal proteins cannot be ignored. Therefore, the domestic livestock should be urgently treated with surface water, while provision of both arsenic-free drinking water and nutritional supplements is mandatory for the affected human population to overcome the severe arsenic crisis situation.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Biotransformation factor; Consumable animal products; Dietary intakes of arsenic; Human health risk; Livestock.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abedin, M. J., Cresser, M. S., Meharg, A. A., Feldmann, J., & Cotter-Howells, J. (2002). Arsenic accumulation and metabolism in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Science & Technology, 36(5), 962–968. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0101678 . - DOI
    1. Abernathy, C. O., Liu, Y. P., Longfellow, D., Aposhian, H. V., Beck, B., Fowler, B., et al. (1999). Arsenic: Health effects, mechanisms of actions, and research issues. Environmental Health Perspectives, 107(7), 593–597. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.99107593 . - DOI
    1. Abrahams, P. W., & Thornton, I. (1994). The contamination of agricultural land in the metalliferous province of southwest England: Implications to livestock. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 48(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8809(94)90083-3 . - DOI
    1. Ahmed, M. K., Shaheen, N., Islam, M. S., Habibullah-Al-Mamun, M., Islam, S., Islam, M. M., et al. (2016). A comprehensive assessment of arsenic in commonly consumed foodstuffs to evaluate the potential health risk in Bangladesh. Science of the Total Environment., 544, 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.133 . - DOI
    1. AgriAs, 2017. Evaluation and management of arsenic contamination in agricultural soil and water. Water JPI, EU (2017–2019).Retrieved from http://projects.gtk.fi/AgriAs/

LinkOut - more resources