Bimodal Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Suitable Intervention Model for Children at the Early Developmental Stage
- PMID: 33492797
- DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002812
Bimodal Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Suitable Intervention Model for Children at the Early Developmental Stage
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the auditory and speech benefit of bimodal stimulation for prelingual deafened cochlear implantation recipients.
Study design: Retrospective and comparative study.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: Fifty-six children with bilateral prelingual profound sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled, including 28 consecutive children with unilateral cochlear implantation (CI group), and 28 consecutive children with bimodal stimulation (BI group) who used an additional hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral ear.
Main outcome measures: Hearing assessments included the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) and Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP). Speech evaluations included the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR). These measurements were evaluated at the first mapping of cochlear implants and 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after. Data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis.
Results: The mean ages of BI and CI groups were similar (17.6 ± 6.87 vs 19.0 ± 8.10 months, p = 0.497). The initial scores for hearing and speech assessments showed no differences between the two groups, apart from IT-MAIS (2.46 ± 0.631 in BI group vs 0.50 ± 0.279 in CI group, p = 0.004). The auditory and speech development over time were different in the two groups as seen in IT-MAIS (p < 0.001), CAP (p = 0.029), MUSS (p < 0.001), and SIR (p < 0.001). A continuing but stable difference was observed in CAP, MUSS, and SIR at 3, 18, and 12 months after the first mapping, respectively. In addition, the BI group had better IT-MAIS scores at 3 and 6 months compared with the CI group; however, the difference was not significant after 12 months.
Conclusion: Bimodal stimulation is beneficial for prelingually deafened CI recipients who have minimal contralateral residual hearing when bilateral CIs are not available. Hearing aid use in the contralateral ear might be recommended for children after unilateral cochlear implantation to facilitate the development of auditory and speech skills.
Similar articles
-
[Effects of bimodal intervention on the development of auditory and speech ability in infants with unilateral cochlear implantation].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Mar 7;53(3):203-208. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.03.007. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29614553 Chinese.
-
Long-term Outcomes in Down Syndrome Children After Cochlear Implantation: Particular Issues and Considerations.Otol Neurotol. 2019 Dec;40(10):1278-1286. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002410. Otol Neurotol. 2019. PMID: 31634275
-
Bilateral cochlear implants in infants: a new approach--Nucleus Hybrid S12 project.Otol Neurotol. 2010 Oct;31(8):1300-9. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181f2eba1. Otol Neurotol. 2010. PMID: 20802369 Free PMC article.
-
A review of the outcomes of children with designated additional needs receiving cochlear implantation for severe to profound hearing loss.Cochlear Implants Int. 2021 Nov;22(6):338-344. doi: 10.1080/14670100.2021.1944519. Epub 2021 Jul 5. Cochlear Implants Int. 2021. PMID: 34219615 Review.
-
The effect of side of implantation on unilateral cochlear implant performance in patients with prelingual and postlingual sensorineural hearing loss: A systematic review.Clin Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr;43(2):440-449. doi: 10.1111/coa.12988. Epub 2017 Oct 19. Clin Otolaryngol. 2018. PMID: 28944603
Cited by
-
A Review of Speech Perception of Mandarin-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implantation.Front Neurosci. 2021 Dec 14;15:773694. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.773694. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34970113 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Neurobehavioral effects of general anesthesia and cochlear implantation on hearing-impaired infants: A prospective observational cohort study.Brain Behav. 2023 Oct;13(10):e3216. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3216. Epub 2023 Aug 13. Brain Behav. 2023. PMID: 37574593 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Novaes BC, Versolatto-Cavanaugh MC, Figueiredo Rde S, et al. Determinants of communication skills development in children with hearing impairment. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012; 24:335–341.
-
- Lammers MJ, van der Heijden GJ, Pourier VE, et al. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. Laryngoscope 2014; 124:1694–1699.
-
- Johnston JC, Durieux-Smith A, Angus D, et al. Bilateral paediatric cochlear implants: A critical review. Int J Audiol 2009; 48:601–617.
-
- van Schoonhoven J, Sparreboom M, van Zanten BG, et al. The effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in adults: A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34:190–198.
-
- van Zon A, Smulders YE, Stegeman I, et al. Stable benefits of bilateral over unilateral cochlear implantation after two years: A randomized controlled trial. Laryngoscope 2017; 127:1161–1168.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous