Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;41(10):1357-1362.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002812.

Bimodal Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Suitable Intervention Model for Children at the Early Developmental Stage

Affiliations

Bimodal Stimulation in Children With Bilateral Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Suitable Intervention Model for Children at the Early Developmental Stage

Ying Chen et al. Otol Neurotol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the auditory and speech benefit of bimodal stimulation for prelingual deafened cochlear implantation recipients.

Study design: Retrospective and comparative study.

Setting: Tertiary referral center.

Patients: Fifty-six children with bilateral prelingual profound sensorineural hearing loss were enrolled, including 28 consecutive children with unilateral cochlear implantation (CI group), and 28 consecutive children with bimodal stimulation (BI group) who used an additional hearing aid (HA) in the contralateral ear.

Main outcome measures: Hearing assessments included the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS) and Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP). Speech evaluations included the Meaningful Use of Speech Scale (MUSS), and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR). These measurements were evaluated at the first mapping of cochlear implants and 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after. Data were analyzed by repeated measures analysis.

Results: The mean ages of BI and CI groups were similar (17.6 ± 6.87 vs 19.0 ± 8.10 months, p = 0.497). The initial scores for hearing and speech assessments showed no differences between the two groups, apart from IT-MAIS (2.46 ± 0.631 in BI group vs 0.50 ± 0.279 in CI group, p = 0.004). The auditory and speech development over time were different in the two groups as seen in IT-MAIS (p < 0.001), CAP (p = 0.029), MUSS (p < 0.001), and SIR (p < 0.001). A continuing but stable difference was observed in CAP, MUSS, and SIR at 3, 18, and 12 months after the first mapping, respectively. In addition, the BI group had better IT-MAIS scores at 3 and 6 months compared with the CI group; however, the difference was not significant after 12 months.

Conclusion: Bimodal stimulation is beneficial for prelingually deafened CI recipients who have minimal contralateral residual hearing when bilateral CIs are not available. Hearing aid use in the contralateral ear might be recommended for children after unilateral cochlear implantation to facilitate the development of auditory and speech skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Novaes BC, Versolatto-Cavanaugh MC, Figueiredo Rde S, et al. Determinants of communication skills development in children with hearing impairment. J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol 2012; 24:335–341.
    1. Lammers MJ, van der Heijden GJ, Pourier VE, et al. Bilateral cochlear implantation in children: A systematic review and best-evidence synthesis. Laryngoscope 2014; 124:1694–1699.
    1. Johnston JC, Durieux-Smith A, Angus D, et al. Bilateral paediatric cochlear implants: A critical review. Int J Audiol 2009; 48:601–617.
    1. van Schoonhoven J, Sparreboom M, van Zanten BG, et al. The effectiveness of bilateral cochlear implants for severe-to-profound deafness in adults: A systematic review. Otol Neurotol 2013; 34:190–198.
    1. van Zon A, Smulders YE, Stegeman I, et al. Stable benefits of bilateral over unilateral cochlear implantation after two years: A randomized controlled trial. Laryngoscope 2017; 127:1161–1168.

Publication types