Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan:5:125-133.
doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00117.

Feasibility of Fitness Tracker Usage to Assess Activity Level and Toxicities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

Affiliations

Feasibility of Fitness Tracker Usage to Assess Activity Level and Toxicities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer

William H Ward et al. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: Performance status (PS) is a subjective assessment of patients' overall health. Quantification of physical activity using a wearable tracker (Fitbit Charge [FC]) may provide an objective measure of patient's overall PS and treatment tolerance.

Materials and methods: Patients with colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled into two cohorts (medical and surgical) and asked to wear FC for 4 days at baseline (start of new chemotherapy [± 4 weeks] or prior to curative resection) and follow-up (4 weeks [± 2 weeks] after initial assessment in medical and postoperative discharge in surgical cohort). Primary end point was feasibility, defined as 75% of patients wearing FC for at least 12 hours/d, 3 of 4 assigned days. Mean steps per day (SPD) were correlated with toxicities of interest (postoperative complication or ≥ grade 3 toxicity). A cutoff of 5,000 SPD was selected to compare outcomes.

Results: Eighty patients were accrued over 3 years with 55% males and a median age of 59.5 years. Feasibility end point was met with 68 patients (85%) wearing FC more than predefined duration and majority (91%) finding its use acceptable. The mean SPD count for patients with PS 0 was 6,313, and for those with PS 1, it was 2,925 (122 and 54 active minutes, respectively) (P = .0003). Occurrence of toxicity of interest was lower among patients with SPD > 5,000 (7 of 33, 21%) compared with those with SPD < 5,000 (14 of 43, 32%), although not significant (P = .31).

Conclusion: Assessment of physical activity with FC is feasible in patients with colorectal cancer and well-accepted. SPD may serve as an adjunct to PS assessment and a possible tool to help predict toxicities, regardless of type of therapy. Future studies incorporating FC can standardize patient assessment and help identify vulnerable population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram of enrolled patients. FC, Fitbit Charge.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Distribution of the length of time participants wore Fitbit tracker, by study day.
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Incidence of TOIs by PS (A and B) and SPD (C and D) in medical and surgical cohorts (unadjusted values, n [%]). ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; SPD, steps per day; TOI, toxicity of interest.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Goding Sauer A, et al. : Colorectal cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:145-164, 2020 - PubMed
    1. Willett CG: Management of locoregional rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 16:617-619, 2018 - PubMed
    1. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. : NCCN guidelines insights: colon cancer, version 2.2018. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 16:359-69, 2018 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aapro M, Scotte F, Bouillet T, et al. : A practical approach to fatigue management in colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 16:275-285, 2017 - PubMed
    1. Van Blarigan EL, Meyerhardt JA: Role of physical activity and diet after colorectal cancer diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 33:1825-1834, 2015 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types