Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 May:235:132-139.
doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to the risk of stroke: A secondary analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Edoxaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation in relation to the risk of stroke: A secondary analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 study

Joris R de Groot et al. Am Heart J. 2021 May.
Free article

Abstract

Introduction: The efficacy and safety of the oral factor Xa inhibitor edoxaban compared to warfarin stratified by CHA2DS2VASc scores have not been described.

Methods: The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial randomized patients with atrial fibrillation to once-daily edoxaban or warfarin. We classified patients based on CHA2DS2VASc score and compared pharmacokinetics (edoxaban concentration), pharmacodynamics (anti-factor Xa [FXa] with edoxaban, time-in-therapeutic range for warfarin), efficacy (stroke or systemic embolism [SSE]), safety (major bleeding [MB], intracranial hemorrhage), and cardiovascular mortality, for the approved edoxaban regimen vs warfarin.

Results: The distribution CHA2DS2VASc score were:≤3, N = 4159 (29.6%); 4, N = 4066 (28.9%); 5, N = 3165 (22.5%); and ≥6, N = 2681 (19.1%). Increasing rates of SSE (1.05 to 2.99%/year) and MB (2.27 to 4.66%/year) were observed in the warfarin arm as the CHA2DS2VASc score increased. The hazard ratios per unit increase of CHA2DS2VASc score were 1.29 (1.21-1.38) and 1.26 (1.17-1.36) for SSE, and 1.20 (1.13-1.27) and 1.19 (1.12-1.27) for MB, with warfarin and edoxaban, respectively. Time-in-therapeutic range in warfarin-treated patients was similar and high (median 68%-69%) across CHA2DS2VASc scores, whereas edoxaban trough concentration, exogenous anti-FXa activity and %inhibition of endogenous FXa were higher at increasing CHA2DS2VASc scores. Edoxaban reduced SSE, MB, intracranial hemorrhage, and cardiovascular mortality vs warfarin to a similar degree across the range of CHA2DS2VASc scores (P-int = 0.90, 0.96, 0.21, and 0.37, respectively). Because of higher event rates the number of events prevented with edoxaban tended to be greater in patients with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores.

Conclusion: The benefit and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin is maintained across CHA2DS2VASc scores. While the relative risk reductions remain similar, edoxaban provides incrementally larger absolute reductions in outcomes over warfarin in patients with higher CHA2DS2VASc scores.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest: Dr. De Groot - research grant through his institution: Abbott, Atricure, Bayer, Boston Scientific, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic. Honoraria for scientific advisory boards and consulting: Atricure, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Johnson&Johnson, Medtronic, Novartis, Servier. Dr. Ruff - research grants through institution: Anthos, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, National Institutes of Health. Honoraria for scientific advisory boards and consulting: Anthos, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Pfizer, Portola. Dr. Murphy - research grants from Abbott Laboratories, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Critical Diagnostics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia Therapeutics, Merck and Co., Roche Diagnostics, Takeda, Gilead, Poxel, Novartis, MedImmune, Janssen Research Development, and Genzyme. Ms. Hamershock - grant support through her institution rom Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Vehmeijer nothing to report. Dr. Oude Ophuis - grant support to his institution from Daiichi Sankyo, personal fees from TIMI during the conduct of the study; grant support and personal fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott; personal fees from AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme; and nonfinancial support from Biosensor, WCN, and Vascular Research Network outside the submitted work. Ms. Grip - grant support through her institution from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Lanz - employment at Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Mercuri - employment at Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Antman - grant support through his institution from Daiichi Sankyo. Dr. Giugliano - grant support through his institution from Daiichi Sankyo and Anthos; personal fees for CME lectures and/or consulting from Boheringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, CryoLife, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, SAJA Pharmaceuticals and Servier. Drs. Ruff, Antman, and Giugliano and Ms Murphy, Hamershock and Grip report Institutional research grant to the TIMI Study Group at Brigham and Women's Hospital for research they are not directly involved in from Abbott, Amgen, Anthos, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia, Janssen Research and Development, Medicines Company, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Poxel, Pfizer, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Regeneron, Roche, Siemens, Takeda, The Medicines Company, Zora Biosciences.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms