Visual Acuity Outcomes after Phacoemulsification in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity before Cataract Surgery
- PMID: 33494090
- PMCID: PMC8280449
- DOI: 10.1159/000514662
Visual Acuity Outcomes after Phacoemulsification in Eyes with Good Visual Acuity before Cataract Surgery
Abstract
Objective: to analyse cataract surgery outcomes and related factors in eyes presenting with good visual acuity.
Subject and methods: A retrospective longitudinal study of patients undergoing phacoemulsification between 2014 and 2018 in Moorfields Eye Hospital was conducted. Pre- and post-operative visual acuities were analysed. Inclusion criteria were age ≥40 years and pinhole visual acuity ≥6/9 pre-operatively. Exclusion criteria were no post-operative visual acuity data. The visual acuity change variable was also defined according to post-operative visual acuity being above or below the Snellen 6/9 threshold.
Results: 2,720 eyes were included. The unaided logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.54 to 0.20 (p < 0.001), the logMAR visual acuity with glasses improved from 0.35 to 0.05 (p < 0.001), and the logMAR pinhole visual acuity improved from 0.17 to 0.13 (p < 0.001); 8.1% of patients had Snellen visual acuity <6/9 post-operatively. Mean follow-up period was 23.6 ± 9.9 days. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with visual acuity <6/9 post-operatively were age (OR = 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.95, 0.98], p < 0.001), vitreous loss (OR = 0.21, 95% CI [0.08, 0.56], p = 0.002), and iris trauma (OR = 0.28, 95% CI [0.10, 0.82] p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Visual acuity improved significantly, although at least 8.1% of them did not reach their pinhole preoperative visual acuity. Worse visual acuity outcomes were associated with increasing age, vitreous loss, and iris trauma. The 6/9 vision threshold may not be able to accurately differentiate those who may benefit from cataract surgery and those who may not.
Keywords: Clear lens extraction; Iris trauma; Vitreous loss.
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Flaxman SR, Bourne RR, Resnikoff S, Ackland P, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5((12)):e1221–e34. - PubMed
-
- Kelly SP, Astbury NJ. Patient safety in cataract surgery. Eye. 2006;20((3)):275. - PubMed
-
- Kessel L, Haargaard B, Boberg-Ans GE, Henning VA. Time trends in indication for cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011;2
-
- Falck A, Virtanen P, Tuulonen A. Is more always better in cataract surgery? Acta Ophthalmol. 2012;90((8)):e653. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
