Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 25;79(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/s13690-021-00528-0.

Indicators of guideline-concordant care in lung cancer defined with a modified Delphi method and piloted in a cohort of over 5,800 cases

Anita Andreano  1 , Maria Grazia Valsecchi  2 , Antonio Giampiero Russo  3 , Salvatore Siena  4 ; Lombardy Lung Cancer Working Group
Collaborators, Affiliations

Indicators of guideline-concordant care in lung cancer defined with a modified Delphi method and piloted in a cohort of over 5,800 cases

Anita Andreano et al. Arch Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: To identify indicators of guideline-concordant care in lung cancer, to implement such indicators with cancer registry data linked to health databases, and to pilot them in a cohort of patients from the cancer registry of the Milan Province.

Methods: Thirty-four indicators were selected by revision of main guidelines by cancer epidemiologists, and then evaluated by a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians involved in lung cancer care and working on the pathway of lung cancer diagnosis and treatment in the Lombardy region, Italy. With a modified Delphi method, they assessed for each indicator the content validity as a quality measure of the care pathway, the degree of modifiability from the health professional, and the relevance to the health professional. Feasibility was assessed using the cancer registry and the routine health records of the Lombardy region. Feasible indicators were then calculated in the cohort of lung cancer patients diagnosed in 2007-2012 derived from the cancer registry of the Milan Province. Criterion validity was assessed reviewing clinical records of a random sample of 114 patients (threshold for acceptable discordance ≤20%). Finally, reliability was evaluated at the provider level.

Results: Initially, 34 indicators were proposed for evaluation in the first Delphi round. Of the finally 22 selected indicators, 3 were not feasible because the required information was actually not available. The remaining 19 were calculated on the pilot cohort. After assessment of criterion validity (3 eliminated), 16 indicators were retained in the final set and evaluated for reliability.

Conclusion: The developed and piloted set of indicators is now available to implement and monitor, over time, quality initiatives for lung cancer care in the studied health system.

Keywords: Guideline adherence; Health information systems; Lung neoplasms; Quality indicators, health care; Quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Cancer today [Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 9]. Available from: http://gco.iarc.fr/today/home
    1. Islami F, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global trends of lung cancer mortality and smoking prevalence. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2015;4:327–338. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell HA, Tata LJ, Baldwin DR, Potter VA, Stanley RA, Khakwani A, et al. Treatment decisions and survival for people with small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer. 2014;110:908–915. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.812. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nadpara PA, Madhavan SS, Tworek C, Sambamoorthi U, Hendryx M, Almubarak M. Guideline-concordant lung cancer care and associated health outcomes among elderly patients in the United States. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6:101–110. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2015.01.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hermens RPMG, Ouwens MMTJ, Vonk-Okhuijsen SY, van der Wel Y, Tjan-Heijnen VCG, van den Broek LD, et al. Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline. Lung Cancer Amst Neth. 2006;54:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2006.07.001. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources