Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988 Jan;35(1):16-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF03010538.

Gastric fluid volume and pH in elective inpatients. Part II: Coffee or orange juice with ranitidine

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Gastric fluid volume and pH in elective inpatients. Part II: Coffee or orange juice with ranitidine

J R Maltby et al. Can J Anaesth. 1988 Jan.

Abstract

In order to assess the effect of preoperative oral fluids, with and without ranitidine, on gastric fluid volume and pH 300 elective surgical inpatients, ASA physical status I and II, were randomly allocated to one of six groups. The three ranitidine groups (Groups 4, 5, and 6) are discussed in this paper (Part II), and the three placebo groups (Groups 1, 2, and 3) in Part I. Between two and three hours before the scheduled time of surgery, patients received 150 ml coffee with oral ranitidine 150 mg (Group 4), 150 ml orange juice with oral ranitidine 150 mg (Group 5), or oral ranitidine alone (Group 6). No opiate or belladonna premedication was given. Immediately following induction of anaesthesia a # 18 Salem sump tube was passed and its position in the stomach confirmed by auscultation of insufflated air. The volume of residual gastric fluid, which was aspirated into a 60 ml syringe, was recorded, and its pH was measured. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to volume (Group 4: 14.3 +/- 15.4; Group 5: 14.8 +/- 17.0; Group 6: 9.7 +/- 12.6 ml). The mean pH in all groups was greater than 5.40 (Group 4: 5.65 +/- 2.12; Group 5: 5.41 +/- 2.12; Group 6: 6.21 +/- 1.51).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986 Jan;30(1):84-92 - PubMed
    1. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1982 Sep;29(5):446-51 - PubMed
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1986 Jan;30(1):41-3 - PubMed
    1. Anesth Analg. 1985 Jan;64(1):11-7 - PubMed
    1. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986 Nov;33(6):773-9 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources