Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;38(4):759-777.
doi: 10.1007/s10815-021-02067-7. Epub 2021 Jan 25.

Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI)

Affiliations
Review

Fertility preservation for genetic diseases leading to premature ovarian insufficiency (POI)

Antonio La Marca et al. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The current review aims to summarize the data available concerning the applicability of fertility preservation techniques to genetic conditions at risk of premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).

Methods: A literature review through the PubMed Database was carried out.

Results: About 10% of cases of POI is related to genetic diseases. The most frequent conditions associated with POI are Turner syndrome and fragile X pre-mutation; mutation of BRCA 1-2 genes and several other mutations and genetic syndromes have recently been highlighted, although they rarely occur. If a diagnosis is issued before POI onset, counseling on currently available fertility preservation techniques is advisable. In case of spontaneous menarche (this can occur variably depending on the mutation) established techniques like embryo or oocyte cryopreservation can be proposed, even if, in some cases, their effectiveness may be reduced by ovarian alterations connected to the mutation. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation has recently been defined as an established medical procedure for fertility preservation in young cancer patients and may be an option for prepubertal patients. However, it is still experimental in special populations with genetic diseases causing POI. New innovative experimental techniques, like in vitro maturation of immature oocytes (IVM) and vitro activation (IVA) of immature follicles on ovarian tissue, have shown limited but encouraging data and they will be probably available in the near future. For a correct risk-benefit evaluation, the following aspects should be considered: actual knowledge about the pathology-specific efficacy of the various techniques, the average age of onset of POI, the possible risks associated with the procedure in relation to the underlying pathology, the probability of spontaneous conception, as well as the health implications of a possible future pregnancy..

Conclusions: Fertility preservation techniques represent a crucial opportunity for patients with genetic risk of POI. Early diagnosis increases the chances to apply these techniques. No specific recommendations concerning fertility preservation for each genetic pathology are available, and clinicians should first counsel the patient and her relatives about known risks and benefits of the available techniques, both those established and those considered as experimental.

Keywords: BRCA; Cryopreservation; FMR1; Fertility; Genetic; Ovarian insufficiency; Turner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with Turner syndrome
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with FMR1 premutation
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with galactosemia
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with BRCA genes mutation
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with mutation associated with syndromic POI
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Fertility preservation strategy in patients with mutation associated with isolated POI

References

    1. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Group on POI. Webber L, Davies M, Anderson R, Bartlett J, Braat D, Cartwright B, Cartwright B, Cifkova R, de Muinck Keizer-Schrama S, Hogervorst E, Janse F, Liao L, Vlaisavljevic V, Zillikens C, Vermeulen N. ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:926–937. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen HH, Milat F, Vincent A. Premature ovarian insufficiency in general practice: meeting the needs of women. Aust Fam Phys 2017. 46:360–6. - PubMed
    1. Grynberg M, Bidet M, Benard J, Poulain M, Sonigo C, Cédrin-Durnerin I, Sonigo C. Fertilitypreservation in Turner syndrome. FertilSteril. 2016;105:13–19. - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Committee opinion no. 605: primary ovarian insufficiency in adolescents and young women. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:193–197. - PubMed
    1. Huhtaniemi I, Hovatta O, La Marca A, Livera G, Monniaux G, Persani L, Heddar A, Jarzabek K, Laisk-Podar T, Salumets A, Tapanainen JS, Veitia RA, Visser JA, Wieacker P, Wolczynski S, Misrahi M. Advances in the molecular pathophysiology,genetics, and treatment of primary ovarian insufficiency. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2018;29:400–419. - PubMed

MeSH terms