Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;82(2):166-175.
doi: 10.1111/jphd.12443. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Mobile photographic screening for dental caries in children: Diagnostic performance compared to unaided visual dental examination

Mohamed Estai  1   2 , Yogesan Kanagasingam  3 , Maryam Mehdizadeh  1 , Janardhan Vignarajan  1 , Richard Norman  4 , Boyen Huang  5 , Heiko Spallek  6 , Michelle Irving  6 , Amit Arora  7   8   9   10 , Estie Kruger  2 , Marc Tennant  2
Affiliations

Mobile photographic screening for dental caries in children: Diagnostic performance compared to unaided visual dental examination

Mohamed Estai et al. J Public Health Dent. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: This study was conducted to compare the use of intraoral photographs with the unaided visual dental examination as a means of dental caries detection in children.

Methods: Children aged 4- to 14-year-olds were visually examined at their schools. Following dental examinations, children had five photographs of their teeth taken using a smartphone camera. Four dental reviewers, who are different from those who visually examined the children, assessed intraoral photographs for dental caries. Sensitivity, specificity, and inter-rater reliability agreement were estimated to assess the diagnostic performance of the photographic method relative to the benchmark visual dental assessments. Caries prevalence was measured using dft/DFT (decayed and filled teeth) index.

Results: One hundred thirty-eight children (67 male and 71 female) were enrolled and had a mean age of 7.8 ± 2.1 years. The caries prevalence (dft/DFT > 0) using photographic dental assessments ranged from 30 percent to 39 percent but was not significantly different from the prevalence (42 percent) estimated with the visual dental examination (P ≥ 0.07). The sensitivity and specificity of the photographic method for detection of dental caries compared to visual dental assessments were 58-80 percent and 99.7-99.9 percent, respectively. The sensitivity for the photographic assessments was high in the primary dentition (63-82 percent) and children ≤7-year-olds (67-78 percent). The inter-rater reliability for the photographic assessment versus the benchmark ranged from substantial to almost perfect agreement (Kappa = 0.72-0.87).

Conclusions: The photographic approach to dental screening, used within the framework of its limitations, yielded an acceptable diagnostic level of caries detection, particularly in younger children with primary dentition.

Keywords: dental caries; early diagnosis; intraoral photography; oral diagnosis; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Arora A, Khattri S, Ismail NM, Nagraj SK, Eachempati P. School dental screening programmes for oral health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;8:CD012595.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Chrisopoulos S, Harford JE, Ellershaw A. Oral health and dental care in Australia: key facts and figures 2015. Cat. no. DEN 229. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016.
    1. Harford J, Luzzi L. Child and teenager oral health and dental visiting. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Canberra; 2013.
    1. Parker EJ, Jamieson LM, Broughton J, Albino J, Lawrence HP, Roberts-Thomson K. The oral health of indigenous children: a review of four nations. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010;46:483-6.
    1. Listl S, Galloway J, Mossey P, Marcenes W. Global economic impact of dental diseases. J Dent Res. 2015;94:1355-61.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources