The Authors Reply
- PMID: 33496468
- DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001954
The Authors Reply
Comment on
-
Quality of Colonoscopy: A Comparison Between Gastroenterologists and Nongastroenterologists.Dis Colon Rectum. 2020 Jul;63(7):980-987. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001659. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020. PMID: 32496332
-
Comment on: Quality of Colonoscopy: A Comparison Between Gastroenterologists and Nongastroenterologists and the Editorial.Dis Colon Rectum. 2021 Apr 1;64(4):e78. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001953. Dis Colon Rectum. 2021. PMID: 33496470 No abstract available.
References
-
- Muthukuru S, Alomari M, Bisen R, et al. Quality of colonoscopy: a comparison between gastroenterologists and nongastroenterologists. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020; 63:980–987
-
- Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, et al. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:1298–1306
-
- Kaminski MF, Regula J, Kraszewska E, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362:1795–1803
-
- Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 110:72–90
-
- Marcondes FO, Dean KM, Schoen RE, et al. The impact of exclusion criteria on a physician’s adenoma detection rate. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82:668–675
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
