Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb;48(1):231-241.
doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01598-5. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Iatrogenic rib fractures and the associated risks of mortality

Affiliations

Iatrogenic rib fractures and the associated risks of mortality

Max R Coffey et al. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: Rib fractures, though typically associated with blunt trauma, can also result from complications of medical or surgical care, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The purpose of this study is to describe the demographics and outcomes of iatrogenic rib fractures.

Methods: Patients with rib fractures were identified in the 2016 National Inpatient Sample. Mechanism of injury was defined as blunt traumatic rib fracture (BTRF) or iatrogenic rib fracture (IRF). IRF was identified as fractures from the following mechanisms: complications of care, drowning, suffocation, and poisoning. Differences between BTRF and IRF were compared using rank-sum test, Chi-square test, and multivariable regression.

Results: 34,644 patients were identified: 33,464 BTRF and 1180 IRF. IRF patients were older and had higher rates of many comorbid medical disorders. IRF patients were more likely to have flail chest (6.1% versus 3.1%, p < 0.001). IRF patients were more likely to have in-hospital death (20.7% versus 4.2%, p < 0.001) and longer length of hospitalization (11.8 versus 6.9 days, p < 0.001). IRF patients had higher rates of tracheostomy (30.2% versus 9.1%, p < 0.001). In a multivariable logistic regression of all rib fractures, IRF was independently associated with death (OR 3.13, p < 0.001). A propensity matched analysis of IRF and BTRF groups corroborated these findings.

Conclusion: IRF injuries are sustained in a subset of extremely ill patients. Relative to BTRF, IRF is associated with greater mortality and other adverse outcomes. This population is understudied. The etiology of worse outcomes in IRF compared to BTRF is unclear. Further study of this population could address this disparity.

Keywords: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Iatrogenesis; Iatrogenic rib fractures; Thoracic trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Age of BTRF patients versus IRF patients.
Figure 2:
Figure 2:
IRF patient mortality rate by age.
Figure 3:
Figure 3:
Effect of propensity matching on bias between the cohorts of patients with BTRF and IRF shown as Mahalonobis distance before and after propensity match.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ziegler DW, Agarwal NN. The morbidity and mortality of rib fractures. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 1994;37:975–9. 10.1097/00005373-199412000-00018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liman S, Kuzucu A, Tastepe A, Ulasan G, Topcu S. Chest injury due to blunt trauma. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2003;23:374–8. 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00813-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sirmali M, Trürüt H, Topçu S, Gülhan E, Yazici Ü, Kaya S, et al. A comprehensive analysis of traumatic rib fractures: morbidity, mortality and management. Eur J Cardio-Thoracic Surg 2003;24:133–8. 10.1016/S1010-7940(03)00256-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shweiki E, Klena J, Wood GC, Indeck M. Assessing the True Risk of Abdominal Solid Organ Injury in Hospitalized Rib Fracture Patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care 2001;50:684–8. 10.1097/00005373-200104000-00015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tran H-V, Charles M, Garrett RC, Kempe PW, Howard CA, Khorgami Z. Ten-Year Trends in Traumatic Cardiac Injury and Outcomes: A Trauma Registry Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 2020. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.12.038. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources