Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun;85(6):3318-3325.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.28673. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Quantification of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction: A proof-of-concept study

Affiliations

Quantification of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction: A proof-of-concept study

Lillian Lu et al. Magn Reson Med. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: To demonstrate a proof of concept for the measurement of myocardial oxygen extraction fraction (mOEF) by a cardiovascular magnetic resonance technique.

Methods: The mOEF measurement was performed using an electrocardiogram-triggered double-echo asymmetric spin-echo sequence with EPI readout. Seven healthy volunteers (22-37 years old, 5 females) were recruited and underwent the same imaging scans at rest on 2 different days for reproducibility assessment. Another 5 subjects (23-37 years old, 4 females) underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance studies at rest and during a handgrip isometric exercise with a 25% of maximal voluntary contraction. Both mOEF and myocardial blood volume values were obtained in septal regions from respective maps.

Results: The reproducibility was excellent for the measurements of mOEF in septal myocardium (coefficient of variation: 3.37%) and moderate for myocardial blood volume (coefficient of variation: 19.7%). The average mOEF and myocardial blood volume of 7 subjects at rest were 0.61 ± 0.05 and 11.0 ± 4.3%, respectively. The mOEF agreed well with literature values that were measured by PET in healthy volunteers. In the exercise study, there was no significant change in mOEF (0.61 ± 0.06 vs 0.62 ± 0.07) or myocardial blood volume (12 ± 6% vs 13 ± 4%) from rest to exercise, as expected.

Conclusion: The implemented cardiovascular magnetic resonance method shows potential for the quantitative assessment of mOEF in vivo. Future technical work is needed to improve image quality and to further validate mOEF measurements.

Keywords: cardiovascular magnetic resonance; contrast-free; handgrip exercise; myocardial blood volume; oxygen extraction fraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Schematic display of the cardiac asymmetric spin-echo sequence with double-echo EPI (ASE-EPI) data acquisitions. The dotted 180° pulses are the refocusing pulses of the spin-echo sequences (time difference TE1/2 from 90° pulses). The diffusion gradients, “Diff,” are used to minimize ventricle blood signals. The trigger delay (TD) is to ensure that ASE-EPI data acquisition will occur in middiastole, to minimize cardiac motion. The two echoes TE1 and TE2 are constants, while the 180° pulse shift τ (eg, τ1, τ2) varies with cardiac cycle. Abbreviation: ECG, electrocardiogram
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
A, Examples of curve-fitting processes in the plot of Ln(S) versus time to obtain oxygen extraction fraction (OEF) and myocardial blood flow (MBV). In this case, the critical time tc is 0.0065 seconds (outlined by the gray vertical line). Equations (1) and (2) in the main text were used to fit to the points at time <tc and time >tc, respectively. The R2 and R2 can be obtained through the regression fitting of Equation (2) (gray lines). B, Illustration of the handgrip exercise within the MR bore. The photo insert shows what the subject viewed inside the scanner. The Blue curve shows the exercise level from baseline to the prescribed exercise strength, and the two red dotted lines indicate the tolerance range during the exercise (usually 10% of baseline strength)
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Bland-Altman plots for the cardiovascular MR (CMR)–measured resting mOEF (A) and MBV (B) at two time points (time 1 and time 2). Both are expressed without units
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Sample myocardial OEF and MBV maps from 1 participant at time 1 (A,B) and time 2 (C,D). The maps are overlaid on anatomic images. The white region-of-interest regions indicate the septal areas to obtain respective mean values

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Janier MF, André-Fouet X, Landais P, et al. Perfusion-MVO2 mismatch during inotropic stress in CAD patients with normal contractile function. Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H59–H67. - PubMed
    1. Agostini D, Iida H, Takahashi A, Tamura Y, Henry Amar M, Ono Y. Regional myocardial metabolic rate of oxygen measured by O2–15 inhalation and positron emission tomography in patients with cardiomyopathy. Clin Nucl Med. 2001;26:41–49. - PubMed
    1. Bell SP, Adkisson DW, Ooi H, Sawyer DB, Lawson MA, Kronenberg MW. Impairment of subendocardial perfusion reserve and oxidative metabolism in nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. J Card Fail. 2013;19:802–810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Timmer SA, Germans T, Götte MJ, et al. Determinants of myocardial energetics and efficiency in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010;37:779–788. - PubMed
    1. Güçlü A, Knaapen P, Harms HJ, et al. Disease stage-dependent changes in cardiac contractile performance and oxygen utilization underlie reduced myocardial efficiency in human inherited hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10:e005604. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources