Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 12;8(1):e25340.
doi: 10.2196/25340.

Impacts of Low-cost Robotic Pets for Older Adults and People With Dementia: Scoping Review

Wei Qi Koh  1 , Faith Xin Hui Ang  2 , Dympna Casey  1
Affiliations

Impacts of Low-cost Robotic Pets for Older Adults and People With Dementia: Scoping Review

Wei Qi Koh et al. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. .

Abstract

Background: Older adults and people with dementia are particularly vulnerable to social isolation. Social robots, including robotic pets, are promising technological interventions that can benefit the psychosocial health of older adults and people with dementia. However, issues such as high costs can lead to a lack of equal access and concerns about infection control. Although there are previous reviews on the use of robotic pets for older adults and people with dementia, none have included or had a focus on low-cost and familiarly and realistically designed pet robots.

Objective: The aim of this review is to synthesize evidence on the delivery and impact of low-cost, familiarly and realistically designed interactive robotic pets for older adults and people with dementia.

Methods: The Arksey and O'Malley framework was used to guide this review. First, the research question was identified. Second, searches were conducted on five electronic databases and Google Scholar. Studies were selected using a two-phase screening process, where two reviewers independently screened and extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. Finally, the results were discussed, categorized, and presented narratively.

Results: A total of 9 studies were included in the review. Positive impacts related to several psychosocial domains, including mood and affect, communication and social interaction, companionship, and other well-being outcomes. Issues and concerns associated with its use included misperceptions of the robotic pets as a live animal, ethical issues of attachment, negative reactions by users, and other pragmatic concerns such as hygiene and cost.

Conclusions: Overall, the findings resonate with previous studies that investigated the effectiveness of other social robots, demonstrating the promise of these low-cost robotic pets in addressing the psychosocial needs of older adults and people with dementia. The affordability of these robotic pets appeared to influence the practicalities of real-world use, such as intervention delivery and infection control, which are especially relevant in light of COVID-19. Moving forward, studies should also consider comparing the effects of these low-cost robots with other robotic pets.

Keywords: assistive technology; dementia; intervention; low-cost robot; older adults; pet robots; psychosocial intervention; review; robot; robotic animals; social robot.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Low-cost, familiarly designed robotic pets and toys. Left to right: Joy for All cat, Joy for All dog, Perfect Petzzz cat, Perfect Petzzz dog.
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Béjot Y, Yaffe K. Ageing population: a neurological challenge. Neuroepidemiology. 2019;52(1-2):76–77. doi: 10.1159/000495813. https://www.karger.com?DOI=10.1159/000495813 - DOI - PubMed
    1. World population ageing 2019. United Nations. 2020. [2020-05-21]. https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/agein....
    1. Davidson S, Rossall P. Evidence review: loneliness in later life. Age UK. 2015. [2020-05-21]. https://www.ageuk.org.uk/globalassets/age-uk/documents/reports-and-publi....
    1. At a glance 60: Preventing loneliness and social isolation among older people. Social Care Institute for Excellence. 2012. [2020-05-18]. https://www.scie.org.uk/publications/ataglance/ataglance60.asp.
    1. Hackett RA, Steptoe A, Cadar D, Fancourt D. Social engagement before and after dementia diagnosis in the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. PLoS One. 2019;14(8):e0220195. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220195. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources