Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 20;10(2):186.
doi: 10.3390/plants10020186.

Abiotic Stress in Crop Species: Improving Tolerance by Applying Plant Metabolites

Francisca Godoy  1 , Karina Olivos-Hernández  1 , Claudia Stange  1 , Michael Handford  1
Affiliations
Review

Abiotic Stress in Crop Species: Improving Tolerance by Applying Plant Metabolites

Francisca Godoy et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

Reductions in crop yields brought about by abiotic stress are expected to increase as climate change, and other factors, generate harsher environmental conditions in regions traditionally used for cultivation. Although breeding and genetically modified and edited organisms have generated many varieties with greater abiotic stress tolerance, their practical use depends on lengthy processes, such as biological cycles and legal aspects. On the other hand, a non-genetic approach to improve crop yield in stress conditions involves the exogenous application of natural compounds, including plant metabolites. In this review, we examine the recent literature related to the application of different natural primary (proline, l-tryptophan, glutathione, and citric acid) and secondary (polyols, ascorbic acid, lipoic acid, glycine betaine, α-tocopherol, and melatonin) plant metabolites in improving tolerance to abiotic stress. We focus on drought, saline, heavy metal, and temperature as environmental parameters that are forecast to become more extreme or frequent as the climate continues to alter. The benefits of such applications are often evaluated by measuring their effects on metabolic, biochemical, and morphological parameters in a variety of crop plants, which usually result in improved yields when applied in greenhouse conditions or in the field. As this strategy has proven to be an effective way to raise plant tolerance to abiotic stress, we also discuss the prospect of its widespread implementation in the short term.

Keywords: drought stress; heavy metal stress; primary metabolite; salt stress; secondary metabolites.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Abiotic stress reduces crop yield. Environmental stress factors, such as heat, cold, drought, salinity, and the presence of heavy metals such cadmium, copper, and chromium, elicit stress responses in plants, including an accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reduced photosynthetic activity, which ultimately lower plant growth and thus crop yields.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Application of primary and secondary plant metabolites ameliorates the negative effects of abiotic stress. By applying primary metabolites such as proline, tryptophan (TRP), glutathione (GSH), and citric acid (CA), or secondary metabolites like polyols, lipoic acid (LA), ascorbic acid (AA), glycine betaine (GB), α-tocopherol (α-Toc), and melatonin as foliar sprays or in irrigation water, the tolerance of crops is enhanced when faced with environmental challenges.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rockström J., Williams J., Daily G., Noble A., Matthews N., Gordon L., Wetterstrand H., DeClerck F., Shah M., Steduto P., et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio. 2017;46:4–17. doi: 10.1007/s13280-016-0793-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Döös B.R. Population growth and loss of arable land. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2002;12:303–311. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00043-2. - DOI
    1. Hofmann D.J., Butler J.H., Tans P.P. A new look at atmospheric carbon dioxide. Atmos. Environ. 2009;43:2084–2086. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.12.028. - DOI
    1. U.S. Global Change Research Program . Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States: A State of Knowledge Report. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA: 2009.
    1. Bot A.J., Nachtergaele F.O., Young A. Land Resource Potential and Constraints at Regional and Country Levels. World Soil Resources Report; FAO; Rome, Italy: 2000. p. 122.