Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 20;18(3):847.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph18030847.

Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Fahad D Algahtani  1   2 , Sehar-Un-Nisa Hassan  1 , Bandar Alsaif  1 , Rafat Zrieq  1   2
Affiliations

Assessment of the Quality of Life during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Survey from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Fahad D Algahtani et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 outbreak emerged as an ongoing crisis at the beginning of the year 2020. Its horrific manifestation at the community level significantly affects various dimensions of the quality of life (QoL) of all individuals. The study aimed to examine some of the predictors of the QoL during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia. A cross-sectional online survey questionnaire was used to gather data on the participants' sociodemographic backgrounds, physical health status, psychological reactions, and QoL. We adapted 12 items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Instruments (WHOQOL-BREF) to assess the QoL. The Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) was used to assess depression, anxiety, and stress. The median and inter-quartile range were used to describe the QoL scores. A multinomial regression analysis was computed between QoL score quartiles and associated factors, and the statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. The results of the multinomial regression analysis demonstrated that males (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.31-2.94); participants aged 26 to 35 years (OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.33-19.37); non-Saudi participants (OR = 1.69; 95% CI = 1.06-2.57); individuals with chronic diseases (OR = 2.15; 95% CI = 1.33-3.48); those who lost their job (OR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.04-4.57); and those with depression (OR = 5.70; 95% CI = 3.59-9.05), anxiety (OR = 5.47; 95% CI = 3.38-8.84), and stress (OR = 6.55; 95% CI = 4.01-10.70) were more likely to be in the first quartile of the QoL scores. While the full model predicting the total QoL score was statistically significant (R2 = 0.962, F (750, 753) = 16,705.4, p < 0.001), the three QoL dimensions explained 0.643, 0.283, and 0.036 of the variability in environmental, social, and religious/spiritual dimensions, respectively. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly influenced various aspects of individuals' QoL, as well as their physical and psychological health. Community-based interventions are needed to mitigate the pandemic's negative effects and enhance the health and QoL of the general population.

Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; environmental; lockdown period; quality of life; risk factors; social.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Technical Guidance: Infection Prevention and Control/WASH. [(accessed on 21 June 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica....
    1. Algaissi A.A., Alharbi N.K., Hassanain M., Hashem A.M. Preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Saudi Arabia: Building on MERS experience. J. Infect. Public Health. 2020;13:834–838. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.04.016. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Saudi Center for Disease Prevention and Control Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) Guidelines. [(accessed on 15 June 2020)]; Available online: https://covid19.cdc.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Coronavirus-Diseas....
    1. Haraldstad K., Network T.L., Wahl A.K., Andenæs R., Andersen J.R., Andersen M.H., Beisland E., Borge C.R., Engebretsen E., Eisemann M., et al. A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Qual. Life Res. 2019;28:2641–2650. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fayers P.M., Machin D. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis, and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2015.

LinkOut - more resources