Do-(Not-)Mechanical-Circulatory-Support Orders: Should We Ask All Cardiac Surgery Patients for Informed Consent for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Circulatory Support?
- PMID: 33498412
- PMCID: PMC7864157
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030383
Do-(Not-)Mechanical-Circulatory-Support Orders: Should We Ask All Cardiac Surgery Patients for Informed Consent for Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Circulatory Support?
Abstract
Post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support (PC-ECLS) has seen a substantial increase in use over the past 10 years. PC-ECLS can be a life-saving procedure and is mostly applied in the presence of unexpected, severe cardio-respiratory complication. Despite PC-ECLS being critical in allowing for organ recovery, it is unfortunately closely connected with an unpredictable outcomes, high morbidity, and, even in the case of cardiac function improvement, potential sustained disabilities that have a life-changing impact for the patient and his or her family. Since the decision to start PC-ECLS is made in an acute setting, there is often only limited or no time for self-determined choices. Due to the major impact of the intervention, it would be highly desirable to obtain informed consent before starting PC-ECLS, since the autonomy of the patient and shared-decision making are two of the most important ethical values in modern medicine. Recent developments regarding awareness of the impacts of a prolonged intensive care stay make this a particularly relevant topic. Therefore, it would be desirable to develop a structural strategy that takes into account the likelihood of such an intervention and the wishes and preferences of the patient, and thus the related autonomy of the patient. This article proposes key points for such a strategy in the form of a PC-ECLS informed consent, a do-(not-)mechanical-circulatory-support order (D(N)MCS), and specific guidelines to determine the extent of the shared decision making. The concept presented in this article could be a starting point for improved and ethical PC-ECLS treatment and application.
Keywords: D(N)MCS; ELS; PC-ECLS; do-(not-)mechanical-circulatory-support; ethics; extracorporeal life support; post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support.
Conflict of interest statement
J.S., M.S., W.v.M., K.C., O.S., M.v.d.P., T.D., J.M. and B.M. have nothing to declare. R.L. is a consultant for Medtronic and LivaNova and is a member of the Medical Advisory Board of Eurosets.
Figures

Similar articles
-
In-hospital outcome of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients: the 2007-2017 Maastricht experience.Crit Care Resusc. 2017 Oct;19(Suppl 1):53-61. Crit Care Resusc. 2017. PMID: 29084502
-
2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Jan 4;59(1):12-53. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezaa283. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33026084 Review.
-
2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS expert consensus on post-cardiotomy extracorporeal life support in adult patients.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;161(4):1287-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.09.045. Epub 2020 Oct 7. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021. PMID: 33039139
-
Risk factors associated with adverse outcome following extracorporeal life support: analysis from 360 consecutive patients.Perfusion. 2015 May;30(4):284-90. doi: 10.1177/0267659114542458. Epub 2014 Jul 21. Perfusion. 2015. PMID: 25049285
-
2020 EACTS/ELSO/STS/AATS Expert Consensus on Post-Cardiotomy Extracorporeal Life Support in Adult Patients.Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Jan;111(1):327-369. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.009. Epub 2020 Oct 6. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021. PMID: 33036737
Cited by
-
Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review.Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03689-0. Crit Care. 2021. PMID: 34289885 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults: evidence and implications.Intensive Care Med. 2022 Jan;48(1):1-15. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06514-y. Epub 2021 Sep 10. Intensive Care Med. 2022. PMID: 34505911 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Hernandez A.F., Grab J.D., Gammie J.S., O’Brien S.M., Hammill B.G., Rogers J.G., Camacho M.T., Dullum M.K., Ferguson T.B., Peterson E.D. A decade of short-term outcomes in post cardiac surgery ventricular assist device implantation: Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ National Cardiac Data-base. Circulation. 2007;116:606–612. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.666289. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lorusso R., Raffa G.M., Kowalewski M., Alenizy K., Sluijpers N., Makhoul M., Brodie D., McMullan M., Wang I.W., Meani F., et al. Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Part 2—Pediatric patients. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:1144–1161. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.07.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Doll N., Kiaii B., Borger M., Bucerius J., Krämer K., Schmitt D.V., Walther T., Mohr F.W. Five-Year results of 219 consecutive patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory postoperative cardiogenic shock. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2004;77:151–157. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01329-8. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Smith C., Bellomo R., Raman J.S., Matalanis G., Rosalion A., Buckmaster J., Hart G., Silvester W., Gutteridge G.A., Smith B., et al. An extracorporeal membrane oxygenation–based approach to cardiogenic shock in an older population. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001;71:1421–1427. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)02504-2. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lorusso R., Raffa G.M., Alenizy K., Sluijpers N., Makhoul M., Brodie D., McMullan M., Wang I.W., Meani F., MacLaren G., et al. Structured review of post-cardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Part 1—Adult patients. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2019;38:1125–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.08.014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous