Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;23(5):934-941.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01079-5. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Increasing access to individualized medicine: a matched-cohort study examining Latino participant experiences of genomic screening

Affiliations

Increasing access to individualized medicine: a matched-cohort study examining Latino participant experiences of genomic screening

Joel E Pacyna et al. Genet Med. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Multiple efforts are underway to increase the inclusion of racial minority participants in genomic research and new forms of individualized medicine. These efforts should include studies that characterize how individuals from minority communities experience genomic medicine in diverse health-care settings and how they integrate genetic knowledge into their understandings of health-care needs.

Methods: As part of a large, multisite genomic sequencing study, we surveyed individuals to assess their decision to pursue genomic risk evaluation. Participants included Latino patients recruited at Mountain Park Health Center, a Federally Qualified Health Center in Phoenix, Arizona, and non-Latino patients recruited at a large academic medical center (Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN). Both groups agreed to receive individualized genomic risk assessments.

Results: Comparisons between cohorts showed that Latino respondents had lower levels of decisional conflict about pursuing genomic screening but generally scored lower on genetic knowledge. Latino respondents were also more likely to have concerns about the misuse of genomic information, despite both groups having similar views about the value of genomic risk evaluation.

Conclusion: Our results highlight the importance of evaluating sociocultural factors that influence minority patient engagement with genomic medicine in diverse health-care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Sankar P, Cho MK, Condit CM, et al. Genetic research and health disparities. Jama. 2004;291(24):2985–2989. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Popejoy AB, Fullerton SM. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature. 2016;538(7624):161–164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hinchcliff EM, Bednar EM, Lu KH, Rauh-Hain JA. Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;153(1):184–191. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Manrriquez E, Chapman JS, Mak J, Blanco AM, Chen LM. Disparities in genetics assessment for women with ovarian cancer: Can we do better? Gynecol Oncol. 2018;149(1):84–88. - PubMed
    1. Cruz-Correa M, Pérez-Mayoral J, Dutil J, et al. Clinical Cancer Genetics Disparities among Latinos. J Genet Couns. 2017;26(3):379–386. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources