Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2021 Aug;131(8):1761-1768.
doi: 10.1002/lary.29414. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Different Surgical Strategies in the Prevention of Frey Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Different Surgical Strategies in the Prevention of Frey Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Armando De Virgilio et al. Laryngoscope. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Objective/hypothesis: To define the best surgical technique able to reduce Frey syndrome (FS) incidence after parotidectomy.

Study design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Methods: An arm-based network analysis was conducted using a Bayesian hierarchical model. The primary and secondary outcomes were the incidence of subjective (clinical) and objective (positive starch-iodine test result) FS, respectively.

Results: A total of 3830 patients with a median age of 50.35 years (n = 2323; IQR 44.25-54.18) were included for six interventions [temporoparietal fascia (TPFF), free fat graft (FFG), acellular dermal matrix (ADM), sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) flap, and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) flap]. If compared to no treatment, the greatest reduction of subjective (clinical) FS incidence was measured for the TPFF (OR: 0.07, CI: 0.004-0.57), the ADM (OR: 0.09, CI: 0.02-0.35), and the FFG (OR: 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.42) techniques. However, a significant difference was measured also for the SCM flap (OR: 0.38, CI: 0.18-0.73) and for the SMAS flap (OR: 0.42, CI: 0.19-0.97). All treatments showed a significant reduction of the objective FS incidence if compared to no treatment (FFG, OR: 0.06, CI: 0.002-0.62; TPFF, OR: 0.07, CI: 0.01-0.33; ADM, OR: 0.11, CI: 0.03-0.44; SMAS, OR: 0.36, CI: 0.17-0.71; SCM, OR: 0.40, CI: 0.19-0.74).

Conclusions: TPFF, ADM, and FFG seem to be the best treatment strategies to prevent FS after parotidectomy. Further randomized controlled trials comparing these techniques should be conducted to define specific indications. Laryngoscope, 131:1761-1768, 2021.

Keywords: Parotidectomy; acellular dermal matrix; free fat graft; temporoparietal fascia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

    1. Frey L. Le syndrome du nerf auriculo-temporal. Rev Neurol 1923;2:97-104.
    1. Duphenix M. Observation sur les fistules du canal salivarie de Stenon. Mem I'Acad R Chir 1757;3:431-439.
    1. Thomas A. Le double reflexe vaso-dilateur et sudoral de la face consecutive aux blessures de la loge parotidienne Les parareflexes. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1927;1:447-460.
    1. Ford FR, Woodhall B. Phenomena due to misdirection of regenerating fibers of cranial, spinal and autonomic nerves: clinical observations. Arch Surg 1938;36:480-496.
    1. Tugnoli V, Marchese Ragona R, Eleopra R, et al. The role of gustatory flushing in Frey's syndrome and its treatment with botulinum toxin type A. Clin Auton Res 2002;12:174-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10286-002-0026-x.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources