Self-efficacy beliefs mediate the association between pain intensity and pain interference in acute/subacute whiplash-associated disorders
- PMID: 33502610
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06731-5
Self-efficacy beliefs mediate the association between pain intensity and pain interference in acute/subacute whiplash-associated disorders
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether a set of pre-accident demographic, accident-related, post-accident treatment and psychosocial factors assessed in people with acute/subacute whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) mediate the association between pain intensity and: (1) pain interference and (2) expectations of recovery, using Bayesian networks (BNs) analyses. This study also explored the potential mediating pathways (if any) between different psychosocial factors.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted on a sample of 173 participants with acute/subacute WAD. Pain intensity, pain interference, pessimism, expectations of recovery, pain catastrophizing, and self-efficacy beliefs were assessed. BN analyses were conducted to analyse the mediating effects of psychological factors on the association between pain intensity and pain-related outcomes.
Results: The results revealed that self-efficacy beliefs partially mediated the association between pain intensity and pain interference. Kinesiophobia partially mediated the association between self-efficacy and pain catastrophizing. Psychological factors did not mediate the association between pain intensity and expectations of recovery.
Conclusion: These results indicate that individuals with acute/subacute WAD may present with lesser pain interference associated with a determined pain intensity value when they show greater self-efficacy beliefs. As the cross-sectional nature of this study limits firm conclusions on the causal impact, researchers are encouraged to investigate the role that patient's self-efficacy beliefs play in the transition to chronic WAD via longitudinal study designs.
Keywords: Acute; Neck pain; Observational study; Psychological factors; Whiplash.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Elliott JM, Walton DM (2017) How do we meet the challenge of whiplash? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 47:444–446. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2017.0106 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bin CH, Yang KH, Wang ZG (2009) Biomechanics of whiplash injury. Chin J Traumatol—English Ed 12:305–314. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-1275.2009.05.011 - DOI
-
- Pink J, Petrou S, Williamson E et al (2016) Economic and health-related quality of life outcomes of whiplash associated disorders. Spine 41:1378–1386. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001512 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yadla S, Ratliff JK, Harrop JS (2007) Whiplash: diagnosis, treatment, and associated injuries. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-007-9008-x - DOI - PMC
-
- Hogg-Johnson S, van der Velde G, Carroll LJ et al (2008) The burden and determinants of neck pain in the general population. Eur Spine J 17:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0624-y - DOI - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials