Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study
- PMID: 33503000
- PMCID: PMC7872326
- DOI: 10.2196/25525
Early Perceptions of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps in German-Speaking Countries: Comparative Mixed Methods Study
Abstract
Background: The main German-speaking countries (Germany, Austria, and Switzerland) have implemented digital contact tracing apps to assist the authorities with COVID-19 containment strategies. Low user rates for these apps can affect contact tracing and, thus, its usefulness in controlling the spread of the novel coronavirus.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the early perceptions of people living in the German-speaking countries and compare them with the frames portrayed in the newspapers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with 159 participants of the SolPan project. Of those, 110 participants discussed contact tracing apps and were included in this study. We analyzed articles regarding contact tracing apps from 12 newspapers in the German-speaking countries.
Results: Study participants perceived and newspaper coverage in all German-speaking countries framed contact tracing apps as governmental surveillance tools and embedded them in a broader context of technological surveillance. Participants identified trust in authorities, respect of individual privacy, voluntariness, and temporary use of contact tracing apps as prerequisites for democratic compatibility. Newspapers commonly referenced the use of such apps in Asian countries, emphasizing the differences in privacy regulation among these countries.
Conclusions: The uptake of digital contact tracing apps in German-speaking countries may be undermined due to privacy risks that are not compensated by potential benefits and are rooted in a deeper skepticism towards digital tools. When authorities plan to implement new digital tools and practices in the future, they should be very transparent and proactive in communicating their objectives and the role of the technology-and how it differs from other, possibly similar, tools. It is also important to publicly address ethical, legal, and social issues related to such technologies prior to their launch.
Keywords: COVID-19; app; contact tracing; content analysis; digital surveillance; interview; interview study; newspaper content analysis; privacy; privacy paradox; surveillance; trust.
©Bettina Maria Zimmermann, Amelia Fiske, Barbara Prainsack, Nora Hangel, Stuart McLennan, Alena Buyx. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 08.02.2021.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33493125 Free PMC article.
-
Digital contact-tracing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of newspaper coverage in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246524. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33534839 Free PMC article.
-
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 34081602 Free PMC article.
-
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989. J Med Internet Res. 2021. PMID: 33890867 Free PMC article.
-
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34003764 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Normative positions towards COVID-19 contact-tracing apps: findings from a large-scale qualitative study in nine European countries.Crit Public Health. 2021 Jun 2;32(1):5-18. doi: 10.1080/09581596.2021.1925634. eCollection 2022. Crit Public Health. 2021. PMID: 37377839 Free PMC article.
-
The French General Population's Perception of New Information and Communication Technologies for Medical Consultations: National Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 16;25:e45822. doi: 10.2196/45822. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37327032 Free PMC article.
-
Physician perceptions of surveillance: Wearables, Apps, and Chatbots for COVID-19.Digit Med. 2022 May 12:10.4103/digm.digm_28_21. doi: 10.4103/digm.digm_28_21. Online ahead of print. Digit Med. 2022. PMID: 36245571 Free PMC article.
-
Use and Perception of Digital Health Technologies by Surgical Patients in Germany in the Pre-COVID-19 Era: Survey Study.JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 20;6(5):e33985. doi: 10.2196/33985. JMIR Form Res. 2022. PMID: 35594072 Free PMC article.
-
Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 14;8(1):e22113. doi: 10.2196/22113. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022. PMID: 34794117 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Die Corona-Warn-App: Unterstützt uns im Kampf gegen Corona. German Federal Government. 2021. [2021-01-11]. https://www.bundesregierung.de/breg-de/themen/corona-warn-app.
-
- SwissCovid App. Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. 2021. [2021-01-11]. https://bag-coronavirus.ch/swisscovid-app/
-
- Questions and answers about the Stop Corona app. Stop Corona App (Austrian Red Cross) 2021. [2021-01-11]. https://www.stopp-corona.at/faq_stopp_corona_app/
-
- PEPP-PT Documentation. PEPP-PT Consortium. [2021-01-11]. https://github.com/pepp-pt/pepp-pt-documentation.
-
- DP-3T Documents. DP-3T Consortium. [2021-01-11]. https://github.com/DP-3T/documents.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical