Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 25;10(2):89.
doi: 10.3390/biology10020089.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy: Double Reading of Chest CT Examination

Affiliations

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy: Double Reading of Chest CT Examination

Alfonso Reginelli et al. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

To assess the performance of the second reading of chest compute tomography (CT) examinations by expert radiologists in patients with discordance between the reverse transcription real-time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test for COVID-19 viral pneumonia and the CT report. Three hundred and seventy-eight patients were included in this retrospective study (121 women and 257 men; 71 years median age, with a range of 29-93 years) and subjected to RT-PCR tests for suspicious COVID-19 infection. All patients were subjected to CT examination in order to evaluate the pulmonary disease involvement by COVID-19. CT images were reviewed first by two radiologists who identified COVID-19 typical CT patterns and then reanalyzed by another two radiologists using a CT structured report for COVID-19 diagnosis. Weighted к values were used to evaluate the inter-reader agreement. The median temporal window between RT-PCRs execution and CT scan was zero days with a range of (-9,11) days. The RT-PCR test was positive in 328/378 (86.8%). Discordance between RT-PCR and CT findings for viral pneumonia was revealed in 60 cases. The second reading changed the CT diagnosis in 16/60 (26.7%) cases contributing to an increase the concordance with the RT-PCR. Among these 60 cases, eight were false negative with positive RT-PCR, and 36 were false positive with negative RT-PCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of CT were respectively of 97.3%, 53.8%, 89.0%, and 88.4%. Double reading of CT scans and expert second readers could increase the diagnostic confidence of radiological interpretation in COVID-19 patients.

Keywords: COVID-19; chest CT; double reading; radiological signs; structured report.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of patients with discordant findings between RT-PCR test and CT.
Figure 2
Figure 2
CT examination of a patient with clinical suspicion of COVID-19 infection and negative RT-PCR test. The CT images show the presence of GGO areas with typical roundish morphology and a predominantly peripheral distribution, a suspect picture for COVID-19 infection. The second RT-PCR test showed positive results.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Patients with a positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 infection. The CT exams detected areas of GGO and parenchymal consolidation with multifocal diffuse (a) or predominantly peripheral distribution (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
CT examination of a patient with a positive RT-PCR test for COVID-19 infection. The same CT shows a single localization of GGO in the right lower lobe with a rounded morphology.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The CT images show a typical aspect of bilateral extended crazy paving characterized by GGO with septal thickening, patchy distribution, and aerial bronchogram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) [(accessed on 21 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/middle-east-respiratory-syndrome-coron....
    1. World Health Organization Naming the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-2019) and the Virus That Causes It. [(accessed on 21 March 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technica....
    1. China National Health Commission . Diagnosis and Treatment of Pneumonitis Caused by New Coronavirus. National Health Commission; Beijing, China: 2020. Trial Version 5.
    1. Poon L.L., Chan K.H., Wong O.K., Cheung T.K., Ng I., Zheng B., Seto W.H., Yuen K.Y., Guan Y., Peirs J.S.M. Detection of SARS coronavirus in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome by conventional and real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR assays. Clin. Chem. 2004;50:67–72. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.023663. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferrari D., Sabetta E., Ceriotti D., Motta A., Strollo M., Banfi G., Locatelli M. Routine blood analysis greatly reduces the false-negative rate of RT-PCR testing for COVID-19. Acta Biomed. 2020;91:e2020003. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources