Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;8(1):e001431.
doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001431.

Algorithm for cavo-tricuspid isthmus flutter on surface ECGs: the ACTIONS study

Affiliations
Review

Algorithm for cavo-tricuspid isthmus flutter on surface ECGs: the ACTIONS study

Daniel R Frisch et al. Open Heart. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: Cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter (CTI-AFL) is an important arrhythmia to recognise because there is a highly effective and relatively low-risk ablation strategy. However, clinical experience has demonstrated that providers often have difficulty distinguishing AFL from atrial fibrillation.

Methods: We developed a novel ECG-based three-step algorithm to identify CTI-AFL based on established CTI flutter characteristics and verified on consecutive ablation cases of typical flutter, atypical flutter and atrial fibrillation. The algorithm assesses V1/inferior lead F-wave concordance, consistency of P-wave morphology and the presence of isoelectric intervals in the inferior leads. In this observation study, the algorithm was validated on a cohort of 50 second-year medical students. Students were paired in a control and experimental group, and each pair received 10 randomly selected ECGs (from a pool of 50 intracardiac electrogram-proven CTI-AFL and 50 AF or atypical AFL cases). The experimental group received a cover sheet with the CTI algorithm, and the control group received no additional guidance.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference in the mean number of correctly identified ECGs among the students in the experimental and control groups (8.12 vs 5.68, p<0.001). Students who used the algorithm correctly identified 2.44 more ECGs as being CTI-AFL or not CTI-AFL. Using the electrophysiology study as the gold standard, the algorithm had an accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 82%, positive predictive value of 78% and negative predictive value of 84% in identifying CTI-AFL.

Conclusion: We developed a three-step ECG algorithm that provides a simple, sensitive, specific and accurate tool to identify CTI-AFL.

Keywords: arrhythmias; atrial flutter; cardiac; electrocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of AFL including typical AFL and atypical AFL, along with their occurrence rates. AFL, atrial flutter; CTI, cavo-tricuspid isthmus.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The CTI algorithm as it appeared when distributed to the medical students in the experimental group. BPM, beats per minute; CTI, cavo-tricuspid isthmus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Parts of the algorithm demonstrated on ECGs. CTI-AFL, cavo-tricuspid isthmus atrial flutter. The left panel shows non-uniform morphology of the P wave and thereby all three criteria are not met thus, this is not CTI-AFL. The middle panel shows an isoelectric interval in the inferior leads and thereby all three criteria are not met thus this is not CTI-AFI. The right panel shows that all three criteria are met thereby, identifying the EGG as CTI-AFL.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Granada J, Uribe W, Chyou PH, et al. . Incidence and predictors of atrial flutter in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:2242–6. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00982-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saoudi N, Cosío F, Waldo A, et al. . A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases; a statement from a joint expert group from the Working group of arrhythmias of the European Society of cardiology and the North American Society of pacing and electrophysiology. Eur Heart J 2001;22:1162–82. 10.1053/euhj.2001.2658 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheinman MM, Yang Y. Atrial flutter: historical notes--part 1. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:379–81. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00446.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Scheinman MM, Yang Y, Cheng J. Atrial flutter: Part II nomenclature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:504–6. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00472.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inama G, Pedrinazzi C, Durin O, et al. . Usefulness and limitations of the surface electrocardiogram in the classification of right and left atrial flutter. J Cardiovasc Med 2006;7:381–7. 10.2459/01.JCM.0000228686.87086.bd - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources