Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 27;12(1):608.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20801-0.

Niche derived netrin-1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy via its receptor neogenin-1

Affiliations

Niche derived netrin-1 regulates hematopoietic stem cell dormancy via its receptor neogenin-1

Simon Renders et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are characterized by their self-renewal potential associated to dormancy. Here we identify the cell surface receptor neogenin-1 as specifically expressed in dormant HSCs. Loss of neogenin-1 initially leads to increased HSC expansion but subsequently to loss of self-renewal and premature exhaustion in vivo. Its ligand netrin-1 induces Egr1 expression and maintains quiescence and function of cultured HSCs in a Neo1 dependent manner. Produced by arteriolar endothelial and periarteriolar stromal cells, conditional netrin-1 deletion in the bone marrow niche reduces HSC numbers, quiescence and self-renewal, while overexpression increases quiescence in vivo. Ageing associated bone marrow remodelling leads to the decline of netrin-1 expression in niches and a compensatory but reversible upregulation of neogenin-1 on HSCs. Our study suggests that niche produced netrin-1 preserves HSC quiescence and self-renewal via neogenin-1 function. Decline of netrin-1 production during ageing leads to the gradual decrease of Neo1 mediated HSC self-renewal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Neo1 is specifically expressed HSC and associated with quiescence.
a Overview of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) and their immunophenotypes. b Relative expression of Neo1 in HSPCs from 3-month-old mice; n = 4–7 (HSC-MPPs) and 9 (CMP/MEP/GMP), two independent experiments. c MFI of NEO1 in HSPCs from 3-month-old mice; n = 90 (MPP2), 118 (MPP34), 126 (MPP1) and 145 (HSC), two independent experiments. d Relative expression of Neo1 in dHSC and aHSC from SCL-tTA; H2B-GFP mice, chase for 5 months; n = 3. e MFI of NEO1 in dHSCs and aHSCs from SCL-tTA; H2B-GFP mice, chase for 5 months; n = 30 (aHSC)–47 (dHSC). f Relative expression of Neo1 in HSCs, 16 h, 5 and 7 days after PBS or poly-I:C injections; n = 3–5 (PBS16h). g Relative expression of Neo1 in HSCs, 16 h after PBS or LPS injections; n = 3 (LPS)–5 (PBS). For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. Scale bars in IF images are 5 μm. P value was determined by two-tailed t test. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Mutant Neo1 causes an initial HSC expansion.
a Relative expression of Neo1 in the total bone marrow of Wt and Neo1gt/gt mice; n = 6, three independent experiments. b Workflow: generation of full chimeras. c Absolute frequencies of bone marrow CD45.2+ HSCs in full Wt and Neo1gt/gt chimeras 4 months after first and second transplantation; n = 5 (2nd Tx)–8 (Ctrl 1st Tx) and 9 (Neo1 1st TX), two independent experiments. d Workflow: competitive transplantations. e Peripheral blood CD45.2+ chimerism during 1° and 2° competitive transplantations of Wt and Neo1gt/gt bone marrow; n = 13–17 (for exact n/timepoint please see Source data file), three independent experiments, Analysis with two-way ANOVA, multiple comparison with LSD Fisher’s test. f CD45.2+ chimerism of HSCs at endpoints of 1° and 2° competitive transplantations of Wt and Neo1gt//gt bone marrow; n = 11 (2nd TX), 12 (Ctrl 1st Tx), 14(Neo1 1st TX), three independent experiments. Whiskers are min–max, box is 25–75th percentile and line is mean. g Workflow: full chimeras studied in (h). h Absolute frequencies of bone marrow CD45.2+ HSCs in full Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 8 months; n = 8 (Ctrl)–9 (Neo1), three independent experiments. i Workflow: Homing assay in (j). j Absolute frequencies of CD45.2+ bone marrow LSK cells 48 h after transplantation of 10,000 sorted Wt and Neo1gt//gt LSK; n = 5 (Ctrl)–6 (Neo1). For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. P value was determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Mutant Neo1 causes premature HSC exhaustion.
a Workflow: aged chimeras, analysed in (bd). b Absolute frequencies of bone marrow CD45.2+ HSPCs in full Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 15 months; n = 7 (Ctrl)–11 (Neo1), two independent experiments. c Absolute blood counts of full Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 15 months; n = 7 (Ctrl)–11 (Neo1), two independent experiments, for HB: 4 (Ctrl)–7 (Neo1). d Frequencies of B cells and myeloid cells of C45.2+ cells in peripheral blood of Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 15 months; n = 5–13 (for exact n/timepoint please see Source data file), two independent experiments. Analysis with two-way-ANOVA, multiple comparisons with LSD Fisher’s test. e Workflow: assessment of HSC potency derived from 15 months (aged) chimeras. f Frequency of CD45.2+ vs. competitor HSCs 16 weeks transplantation of 100 or 500 HSCs from of aged Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras; n = 6 (Ctrl + 500 HSC Neo1)–7(100 HSC, Neo1), two independent experiments. g Workflow: secondary and tertiary transplantations of 15 months (aged) chimeras. h Absolute frequencies of bone marrow CD45.2+ HSPCs in 2° transplantations of aged Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 months; n = 7 (Ctrl)–8 (Neo1), two independent experiments. i Absolute frequencies of bone marrow CD45.2+ HSPCs in 3° transplantations of aged Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 months; n = 6, two independent experiments. j Workflow: generation of full chimeras used in (km). k Cell cycle phase of CD45.2+ HSCs derived from Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 months; n = 4 (Ctrl)–6 (Neo1), two independent experiments. l MFI of CDK6 in CD45.2+ HSC derived from Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 months; n = 23 (Neo1)–29 (Ctrl). m Frequency of BrdU+ CD45.2+ HSC derived from Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 months, 48 h post BrdU injection; n = 6, two independent experiments. For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. P value was determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Scale bars in IF images are 5 μm. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Neo1-mutant HSCs reveal a loss of quiescence and potency signatures.
a, Left: workflow for RNA-seq of CD45.2+ HSCs from Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras after 4 and 15 months. Right: sparse PCA; n = 2 (WT old/young, Neo1 young)–3 (Neo1 old). b GSEA for cell cycle and HSC potency of Wt vs. Neo1gt//gt HSCs. FDR < 0.05, NOM p value <0.05. c Normalized read counts of DEG in HSCs from young and old Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras, n = 4 (Ctrl)–5 (Neo1). d GSEA for HSC ageing signatures in Wt vs. Neo1gt//gt HSCs. FDR < 0.05, NOM p value <0.05. e Normalized read counts of Klf6 in HSCs from young and old Wt and Neo1gt//gt chimeras, n = 4 (Ctrl)–5 (Neo1). f GSEA for signalling pathways in Wt vs. Neo1gt//gt HSCs. FDR < 0.05, NOM p value <0.05. For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. Scale bars in IF images are 4 μm. P value was determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Ntn1 preserves HSC quiescence and engraftment potential in vitro via Neo1.
a Workflow: In vitro stimulation of sorted HSCs used in (bd), analysis after 48 h. b Relative expression of Egr1 in Wt HSCs; n = 3 (other), 4 (RGM-a + b), 16 (Ctrl/Neo1), for ctrl/Ntn1, four independent experiments. c Representative cell cycle plots pre-gated on HSCs and quantification with or without Ntn1 treatment; n = 3 (Neo1), 11 (Wt-Ctrl), 12 (Wt-Ntn1), three independent experiments for ctrl HSC. d MFI of CDK6 in Wt HSCs 48 h after Ntn1 treatment, quantification of MFI per cell; n = 114 (Ctrl) and 134 (Ntn1). e Workflow: representative images and quantification of total cell/nuclear MFI of p65-GFP HSC 48 h after treatment with Ntn1 or Ntn1 + JSH-23; n = 8 (JSH-23), 78 (Ctrl), 91 (Ntn1), two independent experiments. f Workflow: competitive transplantation of Ntn1 stimulated CD45.2 and CD45.1/2 HSCs. g Chimerism of bone marrow LSK-SLAM cells 4 months after competitive transplantation of Control vs. Ntn1-treated HSCs; n = 6 (CD45.1/2), 7 (CD45.2), two independent experiments. For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. Scale bars in IF images are 4 μm. P value was determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. In vivo Ntn1 deletion depletes HSC and Ntn1 overexpression increases HSC quiescence.
a Workflow: analysis of Ntn1flox/flox and CAGGS:CreERT2; Ntn1flox/flox mice 8 weeks after Cre induction for (be). b Representative flow cytometry plots of the LSK population of Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice. c Frequencies of bone marrow HSCs in Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice; n = 7 (flox)–10 (∆CAGGS), two independent experiments. d Cell cycle phase of HSCs derived from Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice; n = 8 (flox) and 10 (∆CAGGS), two independent experiments. e Relative expression of quiescence and activation related genes in HSCs derived from Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice; n = 6 (flox)–9 (∆CAGGS), two independent experiments. f Frequencies of bone marrow HSCs in Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice 5 months after Cre induction; n = 8 (∆CAGGS) and 12 (flox), three independent experiments. g Cell cycle phase of HSCs derived from Ntn1+/LSL-Rosa26-Ntn1 and Ntn1-OE mice; n = 8 (∆CAGGS) and 12 (flox), three independent experiments. h Workflow: competitive transplantation of CAGGS:CreERT2, Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS and Ntn1-OE mice 5 months after Cre induction, analysed in (ik). i Representative FACS plots of peripheral blood leucocytes pre-gated on CD45+ cells at 16 weeks after transplantation. j Peripheral blood CD45.2+ chimerism during competitive transplantations; n = 13 (OE)–14 (Cre/∆CAGGS), two independent experiments. Analysis was done with two-way-ANOVA, multiple comparison with LSD Fisher’s test. k Bone marrow HSC CD45.2+ chimerism after 16 weeks of competitive transplantation; n = 12 (Cre)–13 (∆CAGGS/OE), two independent experiments. l Workflow: transplantation of 200 HSCs sorted from CAGGS:CreERT2 and Ntn1ΔCAGGS/ΔCAGGS mice at 5 months after Cre induction. m Frequencies of bone marrow HSCs 8 weeks transplantation; n = 6. For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. P value was determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 7
Fig. 7. Loss of niche-derived Ntn1 induces Neo1 in HSC upon ageing.
a Relative expression of Ntn1 in CD45+ cells, SEC, AEC and RFP+ SMC derived from Sma-RFP mice; n = 4 (CD45/AEC), 6 (SEC) and 7 (SMA-RFP), two independent experiments. b Frequencies of HSCs in bone marrow of in Ntn1flox/flox and Ntn1ΔSma/ΔSma mice; n = 8 (flox) and 10 (∆SMA), three independent experiments. c Relative expression of Ntn1 in SEC, AEC and CD45+ cells derived from young and old Wt mice; n = 3 (yCD45/oAEC), 4 (oSEC), 6 (ySEC) and 7 (yAEC), three independent experiments. d Normalized read counts of Neo1 in young, and old LSK-SLAM cells; n = 5 (young) and 7 (old), FDR < 0.0001. e MFI of NEO1 in sorted 6 or 24 months LSK-SLAM cells; n = 592 (young)–593 (old). f Most abundant common DEGs in published ageing studies and own data, additional details in the “Methods” section. g Relative expression of Neo1 in LSK-SLAM cells isolated from either denervated or healthy legs of individual mice; n = 8, two independent experiments. h Relative expression of Neo1 in HSCs of aged mice, before and after 2 months post transplantation; n = 6 (before) and 8 (after), two independent experiments. i Model of Neo1/Ntn1 axis in young and old mice. For all panels, ±SD is shown. n indicates biological replicates. Scale bars in IF images are 5 μm. P value determined by two-tailed t test unless stated otherwise. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. Cabezas-Wallscheid N, et al. Identification of regulatory networks in HSCs and their immediate progeny via integrated proteome, transcriptome, and DNA methylome analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15:507–522. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.07.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiel MJ, et al. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 2005;121:1109–1121. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.05.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pietras EM, et al. Functionally distinct subsets of lineage-biased multipotent progenitors control blood production in normal and regenerative conditions. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;17:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2015.05.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busch K, et al. Fundamental properties of unperturbed haematopoiesis from stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2015;518:542–546. doi: 10.1038/nature14242. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodriguez-Fraticelli AE, et al. Clonal analysis of lineage fate in native haematopoiesis. Nature. 2018;553:212–216. doi: 10.1038/nature25168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types