Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 27;11(1):2386.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81594-w.

A candidate gene association analysis identifies SNPs potentially involved in drought tolerance in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

Affiliations

A candidate gene association analysis identifies SNPs potentially involved in drought tolerance in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

Laura Cuervo-Alarcon et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Studies of genetic variation underlying traits related to drought tolerance in forest trees are of great importance for understanding their adaptive potential under a climate change scenario. In this study, using a candidate gene approach, associations between SNPs and drought related traits were assessed in saplings of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) representing trees growing along steep precipitation gradients. The saplings were subjected to experimentally controlled drought treatments. Response of the saplings was assessed by the evaluation of stem diameter growth (SDG) and the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters FV/FM, PIabs, and PItot. The evaluation showed that saplings from xeric sites were less affected by the drought treatment. Five SNPs (7.14%) in three candidate genes were significantly associated with the evaluated traits; saplings with particular genotypes at these SNPs showed better performance under the drought treatment. The SNPs were located in the cytosolic class I small heat-shock protein, CTR/DRE binding transcription factor, and isocitrate dehydrogenase genes and explained 5.8-13.4% of the phenotypic variance. These findings provide insight into the genetic basis of traits related to drought tolerance in European beech and could support the development of forest conservation management strategies under future climatic conditions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters PIabs (a) and PItot (b) measured in the control and drought treated saplings. **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Box plots present median, upper, and lower quartiles; whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Sample size is presented in parentheses.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Stem diameter growth (SDG) measured in 2013 (a), 2014 (b), and 2013–2014 (c) in the control and drought treated saplings from acidic and calcareous soils. Different letters (a, b, c, and d) above whiskers indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Box plots present median, upper, and lower quartiles; whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Sample size is presented in parentheses.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters PIabs (a) and PItot (b) measured in homozygote (AA and TT) and heterozygote (TA) genotypes of the A/T SNP 110_1_293 (a) and in homozygote (AA and CC) and heterozygote (CA) genotypes of the A/C SNP 50_39 (b) that were significantly associated with these parameters under control/acidic (a) and drought/acidic (b) soil conditions, respectively. Different letters (a and b) above whiskers indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Box plots present median, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Sample size is presented in parentheses.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Stem diameter growth (SDG) measured in homozygote and heterozygote genotypes of four SNPs (50_39, 50_232, IDH_1, and IDH_4) that were significantly associated with SDG under drought/acidic (a and b) and drought/calcareous (c, d, e, and f) soil conditions. Different letters (a and b) above whiskers indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). Box plots present median, upper and lower quartiles; whiskers show minimum and maximum values. Sample size is presented in parentheses.

References

    1. Fang J, Lechowicz MJ. Climatic limits for the present distribution of beech (Fagus L.) species in the world. J. Biogeogr. 2006;33:1804–1819. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01533.x. - DOI
    1. Ellenberg H. Vegetation ecology of Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1988.
    1. Trenberth K. Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim. Res. 2011;47:123–138. doi: 10.3354/cr00953. - DOI
    1. Kovats RS, et al. et al. Europe. In: Barros VR, et al.et al., editors. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2014. pp. 1267–1326.
    1. von Wühlisch G. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for Genetic Conservation and Use for European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Rome, Italy: Bioversity International; 2008.

Publication types