Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;60(5):637-655.
doi: 10.1086/705483.

"We Don't Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are": Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities

Affiliations

"We Don't Need a Swab in Our Mouth to Prove Who We Are": Identity, Resistance, and Adaptation of Genetic Ancestry Testing among Native American Communities

Jessica W Blanchard et al. Curr Anthropol. 2019 Oct.

Abstract

Genetic ancestry testing (GAT) provides a specific type of knowledge about ancestry not previously available to the general public, prompting questions about the conditions whereby genetic articulations of ancestry present opportunities to forge new identities and social ties but also new challenges to the maintenance of existing social structures and cultural identities. The opportunities and challenges posed by GAT are particularly significant for many indigenous communities-whose histories are shaped by traumatic interactions with colonial powers and Western science-and for whom new applications of GAT may undermine or usurp long-standing community values, systems of governance, and forms of relationality. We conducted 13 focus groups with 128 participants and six in-depth, semistructured interviews with a variety of community leaders examining the perceptions of GAT within indigenous communities across Oklahoma. Our interviews and focus groups suggest that participants-through the articulation of indigeneity as experiential and relational in nature and inherently distinct from genetic notions of ancestry-resist much of the challenge presented by GAT in usurping traditional forms of identity while at the same time recognizing the utility of the technology for tracing unknown ancestry and identifying health risks in the community.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aspinall PJ 2001. Operationalising the collection of ethnicity data in studies of the sociology of health and illness. Sociology of Health and Illness 23(6):829–862. [JL]
    1. Awang SS 2000. Indigenous nations and the human genome diversity project In Indigenous knowledges in global contexts: multiple readings of our world. George J Sefa Dei, Budd Hall, and Rosenberg Dorothy Goldin, eds. Pp. 120–136. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    1. Babbitt B 2000. Letter from Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt to Secretary of the Army Louis Caldera regarding disposition of the Kennewick human remains. tDAR id:6357; doi:10.6067/XCV84T6J2R. - DOI
    1. Bardill J 2010. Information and misinformation already had: DNA and tribal citizenship. Gene Watch 23(3):8–9.
    1. ———. 2014. Native American DNA: ethical, legal, and social implications of an evolving concept. Annual Review of Anthropology 43:155–166.

LinkOut - more resources