Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 11:11:538793.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.538793. eCollection 2020.

Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical Thinking

Affiliations

Cultural Differences in Mixed Emotions: The Role of Dialectical Thinking

Wen Zheng et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Who can feel both happy and sad at the same time, but not discomfort? This study aimed to investigate the cultural differences in mixed emotional experiences induced by conflict stimuli among American and Chinese undergraduate students. In total, 160 Americans and 158 Chinese watched two different valence advertisements (one predominantly positive and the other predominantly negative) that elicited mixed emotions; their feelings were assessed through self-reported measures. Findings indicated the impact that cultural differences have in people's mixed emotional experiences depends on the emotional components of the mixed emotional situations. The Americans and Chinese both experience a comparably intense mixture of emotions in different valence situations, but their discomfort toward conflicting stimuli is different. Further, dialectical thinking may be a mechanism behind the influence of cultural differences in people's mixed emotional experiences. Implications for emotion theory and research are discussed.

Keywords: culture; dialectical thinking; discomfort; mixed emotions; thinking style.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cultural and situational differences in discomfort induced by conflict stimuli. Condition means of discomfort in predominantly pleasant situation and predominantly unpleasant situation. Error bars indicate 1 standard error of the mean (SE). PPS, predominantly pleasant situation; PUS, predominantly unpleasant situation.**p < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mediation scheme of dialectical thinking in the association between culture and mixed emotional experience (MIN, NAM, and discomfort) in the predominantly positive situation. Illustrated values depict the standardized path parameters of mediation model in predominantly pleasant situations. Chinese participants were coded as 0; American participants were coded as 1; culture served as the independent variable; dialectical thinking as the mediation variable; MIN, NAM, and discomfort in predominantly pleasant situation as the outcome variables; sex and age were control variables. Values in brackets depict the indirect effects of culture on three different predictors. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bagozzi R. P., Wong N., Yi Y. (1999). The role of culture and gender in the relationship between positive and negative affect. Cognit. Emot. 13, 641–672. 10.1080/026999399379023 - DOI
    1. Berrios R., Totterdell P., Kellett S. (2018). When feeling mixed can be meaningful: the relation between mixed emotions and Eudaimonic well-being. J. Happiness Stud. 19, 841–861. 10.1007/s10902-017-9849-y - DOI
    1. Cacioppo J. T., Berntson G. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space - a critical-review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychol. Bull. 115, 401–423. 10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.401 - DOI
    1. Coats A. H., Blanchard-Fields F. (2008). Emotion regulation in interpersonal problems: the role of cognitive-emotional complexity, emotion regulation goals, and expressivity. Psychol. Aging 23, 39–51. 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.39, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Rivera J. (1984). The structure of emotional relationships. Rev. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 5, 116–145.

LinkOut - more resources