Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May-Aug;15(2):91-97.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1459.

Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction

Affiliations

Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction

Sreenivasulu Metikala et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2020 May-Aug.

Abstract

Aim and objective: Ilizarov hip reconstruction (IHR) is a traditional method of salvaging chronic adolescent problem hips but faces practical problems from external fixators leading to reduced compliance. We present the same reconstruction utilising only internal devices with a modification in technique and aim to review early results.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated eight patients between 2014 and 2017 with chronic painful hips treated by a two-stage reconstruction; stage 1 included femoral head resection and pelvic support osteotomy using double plating, while stage 2 comprised distal femoral osteotomy avoiding varus followed by insertion of retrograde magnetic nail for postoperative lengthening. Patients continued physiotherapy postoperatively while protecting from early weight-bearing.

Results: At mean follow-up of 19 months (range 6-36), all osteotomies healed with bone healing index of 47 days/cm (range 30-72). Pain improved from 8.3 (range 7-9) to 2 (range 0-6), while limb length discrepancy got corrected from 4.3 cm (range 3-5) to 1.4 cm (range 0-2.5) at final follow-up. Trendelenburg sign was eliminated in three and delayed in five. No examples of infection or permanent knee stiffness were noted. One patient had plates breakage due to mechanical fall and one had 35 mm of lateral mechanical axis deviation requiring corrective osteotomy.

Conclusion: Pelvic support hip reconstruction with exclusive internal devices is a technique in evolution with encouraging early results. It avoids common complications of external fixators and facilitates quick rehabilitation of joints. Refraining from distal varus can effectively eliminate Trendelenburg gait, albeit with some degree of lateral mechanical axis deviation. Unlike external fixation where there is a possibility of gradual correction, this staged procedure of internal fixation is technically demanding with a learning curve.

Clinical significance: Pelvic support hip reconstruction performed by internal implants is a viable alternative to IHR with potential benefits.

How to cite this article: Metikala S, Kurian BT, Madan SS, et al. Pelvic Support Hip Reconstruction with Internal Devices: An Alternative to Ilizarov Hip Reconstruction. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):91-97.

Keywords: Ilizarov hip reconstruction; Internal lengthening nail; Limb lengthening; Pelvic support osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Pelvic radiograph of an adolescent with secondary osteoarthritis due to avascular necrosis following slipped capital femoral epiphysis and surgical intervention
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fluoroscopic perioperative images showing the valgus extension osteotomy stabilized with double plating internal fixation technique
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Standing mechanical axis view with distraction in progress with the intramedullary lengthening nail
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Final mechanical axis view standing with consolidated regenerated and realigned axis in slight valgus MAD

Similar articles

References

    1. Rozbruch SR, Paley D, Bhave A, et al. Ilizarov hip reconstruction for the late sequelae of infantile hip infection. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2005;87(5):1007–1018. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200505000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pafilas D, Nayagam S. The pelvic support osteotomy: Indications and preoperative planning. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2008;3(2):83–92. doi: 10.1007/s11751-008-0039-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ilizarov GA. Transosseous Osteosynthesis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1992. Hip dislocations. pp. 701–726.
    1. Paley D, Paley D. Principles of Deformity Correction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2002. Hip joint considerations. pp. 647–694.
    1. Paley D, Herzenberg JE, Paremain G, et al. Femoral lengthening over an intramedullary nail. A matched-case comparison with Ilizarov femoral lengthening. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(10):1464–1480. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199710000-00003. - DOI - PubMed