Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May-Aug;15(2):98-105.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10080-1457.

Regenerate Deformity with the Precice Tibial Nail

Affiliations

Regenerate Deformity with the Precice Tibial Nail

Sally Elizabeth Wright et al. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2020 May-Aug.

Abstract

Limb lengthening by distraction osteogenesis is an accepted orthopaedic surgical technique. The Precice intramedullary lengthening system is the most recent innovation in limb lengthening. Early results have been favourable in femoral lengthening but there is little reported on the outcome in tibial lengthening. The aim of this study is to present our early results of Precice tibial lengthening, and the stepwise evolution of our surgical technique.

Materials and methods: A case series of 17 consecutive tibial lengthenings were prospectively analysed. Healing index, length achieved, range of motion, and complications were recorded. The initial cases followed the recommended surgical technique. Progressive regenerate deformity during lengthening required changes to the surgical method.

Results: No cases were lost to follow-up. All the nails lengthened at the desired rate. There were no complications of infection or poor regenerate formation. Progressive valgus and procurvatum was prevented in later cases by the positioning of Poller blocking screws at the time of nail insertion.

Conclusion: The tibial Precice nail is successful in obtaining length and good regenerate formation. The recommended technique was insufficient to control the deforming forces from the lower limb muscle compartments during lengthening. We therefore recommend the addition of multiple blocking screws in an amended technique.

How to cite this article: Wright SE, Goodier WD, Calder P. Regenerate Deformity with the Precice Tibial Nail. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2020;15(2):98-105.

Keywords: Blocking screw; Bone lengthening; Deformity correction; Internal lengthening nail; Intramedullary nail; Limb lengthening; Poller screw; Precice; Tibia; Tibial osteotomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Figs 1A to C
Figs 1A to C
Case 7: (A) Long leg radiograph with valgus postoperative mal-alignment; (B) Intraoperative AP intensifier view of CHAOS technique to acutely correct regenerate 4 months after Precice insertion; (C) AP radiograph of trauma nail in situ with corrected alignment immediately post-CHAOS
Figs 2A and B
Figs 2A and B
Case 8. Use of temporary blocking wires intraoperatively: (A) AP intensifier view; (B) Lateral intensifier view
Figs 3A and B
Figs 3A and B
Case 17. Use of permanent blocking screws: (A) Long leg radiograph with AP blocking screws; (B) Lateral radiograph with sagittal blocking screws

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part I the influence of stability of fixation and soft-tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;238:249. doi: 10.1097/00003086-198901000-00038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Noonan KJ, Leyes M, Forriol F, et al. Distraction osteogenesis of the lower extremity with use of monolateral external fixation. A study of two hundred and sixty-one Femora and Tibiae. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1998;80(6):793. doi: 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paley D. Problems, obstacles, and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(250):81. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199001000-00011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burghardt RD, Manzotti A, Bhave A, et al. Tibial lengthening over intramedullary nails. A matched case comparison with Ilizarov tibial lengthening. Bone Joint Res. 2016;5(1):1. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000577. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park H, Ryu KJ, Kim HW, et al. Is there an increase in valgus deviation in tibial distraction using the lengthening over nail technique? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(5):1283. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4712-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources