Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations
- PMID: 33505621
- PMCID: PMC7816009
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.04.007
Evaluation of microleakage in class-II bulk-fill composite restorations
Abstract
Background/purpose: Despite the clinical appeal of restoring deep class II cavities in single increment using bulk-fill resin composite, sealing of bulk-filled composite restorations is a concern. This study evaluated interfacial adaptation of bulk-fill composite restoration to axial wall and gingival floor of class II cavities using cross-polarization optical coherence tomography (CP-OCT).
Materials and methods: Box-shaped class II cavities were prepared in extracted molars and divided into three groups (n = 7) according to adhesive used; Clearfil SE Bond 2 (SE2), Tetric-N Bond Self-Etch (TSE) or Tetric-N Bond Universal (TNU). All adhesives were applied in self-etch mode and according to manufacturers' recommendation. Then, preparations were bulk-filled with Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior Restorative resin composite and immersed in a contrast agent. Tomographic images of axial wall and gingival floor of each restoration were obtained by CP-OCT (IVS-300, Santec) with a central wavelength of 1330 nm and were imported to an image analysis software to quantify microleakage.
Results: Mann-Whitney U test showed statistically significant difference in microleakage percentage between the groups at both axial wall and gingival floor (p < 0.05). SE2 group had the lowest percentage of microleakage (p < 0.05), as only few cross-sections showed areas of reflections from contrast agent penetrating into axial wall (8.23 ± 6.8) and gingival floor (7.07 ± 4.1), followed by TNU group (18.13 ± 12.9 axially and 30.61 ± 11.9 gingivally). Microleakage was frequently observed at the axial wall and gingival floor of TSE group, showing the highest percentages of 25.50 ± 12.5 and 36.97 ± 10.2, respectively (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: All tested groups exhibited different extent of interfacial microleakage, however, two-step self-etch adhesive yielded superior adaptation in comparison to one-step self-etch adhesive and universal adhesive.
Keywords: Adhesive; Bulk-filled; Composite-resins; Microleakage; Optical coherence tomography.
© 2020 Association for Dental Sciences of the Republic of China. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
No competing financial interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.Dent Med Probl. 2018 Oct-Dec;55(4):383-388. doi: 10.17219/dmp/99264. Dent Med Probl. 2018. PMID: 30648363
-
Optical Evaluation of Enamel Microleakage with One-Step Self-Etch Adhesives.Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Nov;36(11):589-594. doi: 10.1089/pho.2018.4441. Epub 2018 May 29. Photomed Laser Surg. 2018. PMID: 29813001
-
Nondestructive evaluation of microleakage in restored primary teeth using CP-OCT.Niger J Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;24(6):919-924. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_442_20. Niger J Clin Pract. 2021. PMID: 34121742
-
In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.Oper Dent. 2011 Mar-Apr;36(2):213-21. doi: 10.2341/10-215-L. Epub 2011 Jun 24. Oper Dent. 2011. PMID: 21702678 Clinical Trial.
-
Cervical Interfacial Bonding Effectiveness of Class II Bulk Versus Incremental Fill Resin Composite Restorations.Oper Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;40(6):622-35. doi: 10.2341/14-152-L. Epub 2015 Jul 7. Oper Dent. 2015. PMID: 26151459
Cited by
-
Influence of chlorhexidine dentin disinfection on universal adhesive performance: Interfacial adaptation and bond strength assessments.PLoS One. 2024 Dec 31;19(12):e0315036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315036. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39739701 Free PMC article.
-
A Review on the Current State of Microcapsule-Based Self-Healing Dental Composites.J Funct Biomater. 2024 Jun 16;15(6):165. doi: 10.3390/jfb15060165. J Funct Biomater. 2024. PMID: 38921538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative Assessment of Microleakage in Various Bulkfill Flowable Composites: An In Vitro Study.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3976-S3978. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1548_24. Epub 2024 Dec 27. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024. PMID: 39926837 Free PMC article.
-
Noninvasive Adaptation Appraisal of Antimicrobial Nano-Filled Composite.Int Dent J. 2023 Aug;73(4):533-541. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Int Dent J. 2023. PMID: 36549967 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of acid and laser etching of enamel on microleakage in different adhesive systems.Lasers Med Sci. 2024 Jul 15;39(1):181. doi: 10.1007/s10103-024-04120-0. Lasers Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39008166 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Leprince J.G., Palin W.M., Vanacker J., Sabbagh J., Devaux J., Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:993–1000. - PubMed
-
- Ferracane J.L. Resin composite -- state of the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27:29–38. - PubMed
-
- Ferracane J.L., Hilton T.J. Polymerization stress -- is it clinically meaningful? Dent Mater. 2016;32:1–10. - PubMed
-
- Li X., Pongprueksa P., Van Meerbeek B., De Munck J. Curing profile of bulk-fill resin-based composites. J Dent. 2015;43:664–672. - PubMed
-
- Bucuta S., Ilie N. Light transmittance and micro-mechanical properties of bulk fill vs. conventional resin based composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18:1991–2000. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous