Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan;24(1):1-6.
doi: 10.5223/pghn.2021.24.1.1. Epub 2021 Jan 8.

Recent Advances in the Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing

Affiliations
Review

Recent Advances in the Clinical Application of Next-Generation Sequencing

Chang-Seok Ki. Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have changed the process of genetic diagnosis from a gene-by-gene approach to syndrome-based diagnostic gene panel sequencing (DPS), diagnostic exome sequencing (DES), and diagnostic genome sequencing (DGS). A priori information on the causative genes that might underlie a genetic condition is a prerequisite for genetic diagnosis before conducting clinical NGS tests. Theoretically, DPS, DES, and DGS do not require any information on specific candidate genes. Therefore, clinical NGS tests sometimes detect disease-related pathogenic variants in genes underlying different conditions from the initial diagnosis. These clinical NGS tests are expensive, but they can be a cost-effective approach for the rapid diagnosis of rare disorders with genetic heterogeneity, such as the glycogen storage disease, familial intrahepatic cholestasis, lysosomal storage disease, and primary immunodeficiency. In addition, DES or DGS may find novel genes that that were previously not linked to human diseases.

Keywords: Diagnostic exome sequencing; Diagnostic genome sequencing; High-throughput nucleotide sequencing; Next-generation sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The author have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Paradigm change of genetic diagnosis. (A) Traditional gene-by-gene approach using Sanger sequencing. (B) Syndrome-based genetic diagnosis process by diagnostic gene panel sequencing (DPS), diagnostic exome sequencing (DES), or diagnostic genome sequencing (DGS) using next-generation sequencing.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee ES, Cho AR, Ki CS. Identification of SLC26A3 mutations in a Korean patient with congenital chloride diarrhea. Ann Lab Med. 2012;32:312–315. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Choi M, Scholl UI, Ji W, Liu T, Tikhonova IR, Zumbo P, et al. Genetic diagnosis by whole exome capture and massively parallel DNA sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:19096–19101. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adams DR, Eng CM. Next-generation sequencing to diagnose suspected genetic disorders. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1353–1362. - PubMed
    1. Kim JH, Kang E, Heo SH, Kim GH, Jang JH, Cho EH, et al. Diagnostic yield of targeted gene panel sequencing to identify the genetic etiology of disorders of sex development. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;444:19–25. - PubMed
    1. Kim YM, Lee YJ, Park JH, Lee HD, Cheon CK, Kim SY, et al. High diagnostic yield of clinically unidentifiable syndromic growth disorders by targeted exome sequencing. Clin Genet. 2017;92:594–605. - PubMed