Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;33(7):1821-1829.
doi: 10.1007/s40520-020-01782-y. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

SARC-F as a case-finding tool for sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2. National validation and comparison with other diagnostic standards

Affiliations

SARC-F as a case-finding tool for sarcopenia according to the EWGSOP2. National validation and comparison with other diagnostic standards

Karolina Piotrowicz et al. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Sarcopenia is a potentially reversible condition, which requires proper screening and diagnosis.

Aims: To validate a Polish version of sarcopenia screening questionnaire (SARC-F), and assess its clinical performance.

Methods: Cross-sectional validation study in community-dwelling subjects ≥ 65 years of age. Diagnosis of sarcopenia was based on the 2018 2nd European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) consensus. Hand grip and 4-m gait speed were measured, and the Polish version of SARC-F was administered.

Results: The mean (SD) age of 73 participants (21.9% men) was 77.8 (7.3) years. Seventeen participants (23.3%) fulfilled the EWGSOP2 criteria of sarcopenia, and 9 (12.3%) criteria for severe sarcopenia. Fourteen (19.2%) participants fulfilled the SARC-F criteria for clinical suspicion of sarcopenia. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal was 0.84. With EWGSOP2 sarcopenia as a gold standard, the sensitivity of SARC-F was 35.3% (95% CI 14.2-61.7, p = 0.33), specificity was 85.7% (95% CI 73.8-93.6, p < 0.0001). The corresponding positive and negative predictive values were 42.9% (p = 0.79) and 81.4% (p < 0.0001), respectively. The probability of false-positive result was 14.3% (95% CI 6.4-26.2, p < 0.0001) and the probability of false-negative result was 64.7% (95% CI 38.3-85.8, p = 0.33). Overall the predictive power of SARC-F was low (c-statistic 0.64).

Discussion: SARC-F is currently recommended for sarcopenia case finding in general population of older adults. However, its sensitivity is low, despite high specificity.

Conclusions: At present SARC-F is better suited to rule out sarcopenia then to case-finding. Further refinement of screening for sarcopenia with the use of SARC-F seems needed.

Keywords: DXA; EWGSOP2; SARC-F; Sarcopenia; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Comment in

References

    1. Mayhew AJ, Amog K, Phillips S, et al. The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Age Ageing. 2019;48:48–56. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy106. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pacifico J, Geerlings MAJ, Reijnierse EM, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia as a comorbid disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Gerontol. 2020;131:110801. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2019.110801. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beaudart C, McCloskey E, Bruyère O, et al. Sarcopenia in daily practice: assessment and management. BMC Geriatr. 2016;16:170. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0349-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Arnal JF, et al. Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93:101–120. doi: 10.1007/s00223-013-9758-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beaudart C, Rizzoli R, Bruyère O, et al. Sarcopenia: burden and challenges for public health. Arch Public Heal. 2014;72(1):45. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-45. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources