Soil fungal networks moderate density-dependent survival and growth of seedlings
- PMID: 33506513
- DOI: 10.1111/nph.17237
Soil fungal networks moderate density-dependent survival and growth of seedlings
Abstract
Pathogenic and mutualistic fungi have contrasting effects on seedling establishment, but it remains unclear whether density-dependent survival and growth are regulated by access to different types of mycorrhizal fungal networks supported by neighbouring adult trees. Here, we conducted an extensive field survey to test how mycorrhizal and pathogenic fungal colonization of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (ECM) seedlings in a subtropical forest respond to density of neighbouring adult trees. In addition, we undertook a hyphal exclusion experiment to explicitly test the role of soil fungal networks in driving density-dependent effects on seedling growth and survival. Conspecific adult density was a strong predictor for the relative abundance of putative pathogens, which was greater in roots of AM than of ECM seedlings, while mycorrhizal fungal abundance and colonization were not consistently affected by conspecific adult density. Both ECM and AM fungal networks counteracted conspecific density-dependent mortality, but ECM fungi were more effective at weakening the negative effects of high seedling density than AM fungi. Our findings reveal a critical role of common fungal networks in mitigating negative density-dependent effects of pathogenic fungi on seedling establishment, which provides mechanistic insights into how soil fungal diversity shapes plant community structure in subtropical forests.
Keywords: arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi; density dependence; ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi; hyphal exclusion experiment; pathogenic fungi; seedling growth; seedling survival; subtropical forest.
© 2021 The Authors New Phytologist © 2021 New Phytologist Foundation.
Comment in
-
Networks of friends and foes and the fate of tree seedlings.New Phytol. 2021 Jun;230(5):1688-1689. doi: 10.1111/nph.17337. Epub 2021 Apr 12. New Phytol. 2021. PMID: 33843064 No abstract available.
References
-
- Abarenkov K, Nilsson RH, Larsson KH, Alexander IJ, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Høiland K, Kjøller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T et al. 2010. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi-recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytologist 196: 281-285.
-
- Allen GC, Flores-Vergara MA, Krasynanski S, Kumar S, Thompson WF. 2006. A modified protocol for rapid DNA isolation from plant tissues using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide. Nature Protocols 1: 2320-2325.
-
- Babikova Z, Gilbert L, Bruce TJA, Birkett M, Caulfield JC, Woodcock C, Pickett JA, Johnson D. 2013. Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack. Ecology Letters 16: 835-843.
-
- Bagchi R, Gallery RE, Gripenberg S, Gurr SJ, Narayan L, Addis CE, Freckleton RP, Lewis OT. 2014. Pathogens and insect herbivores drive rainforest plant diversity and composition. Nature 506: 85-88.
-
- Barto EK, Weidenhamer JD, Cipollini D, Rillig MC. 2012. Fungal superhighways: do common mycorrhizal networks enhance below ground communication? Trends in Plant Sciences 17: 633-637.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources