Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;142(7):1429-1434.
doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03786-3. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

Supraacetabular osseous corridor: defining dimensions, sex differences, and alternatives

Affiliations

Supraacetabular osseous corridor: defining dimensions, sex differences, and alternatives

Miqi Wang et al. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Introduction: The supraacetabular (SA) corridor extends from the anterior inferior iliac spine to the posterior ilium and can safely accommodate implants to stabilize pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, quantitative analysis of its dimensions and characteristics have not been thoroughly described. This study seeks to define the dimensions, common constriction points, and any alternative trajectories that would maximize the corridor diameter.

Methods: Computed tomography of 100 male and 100 female hemipelves without osseous trauma were evaluated. The corridor boundaries were determined through manual best-fit analysis. The largest intercortical cylinder within the pathway was created and measured. Alternative trajectories were tested within the SA boundaries to identify another orientation that maximized the diameter of the intercortical cylinder.

Results: The traditional SA corridor had a mean diameter of 8.3 mm in men and 6.2 mm in women. This difference in diameter is due to a more S-shaped ilium in women. A larger alternative SA corridor was found that had a less limited path through the ilium and measured 11.3 mm in men and 9.9 mm in women. These dimensions are significantly different compared to those of the traditional SA corridor in both men and women.

Conclusions: In men, the SA corridor allows for the safe passage of most hardware used in pelvic and acetabular fractures. However, in women, the SA corridor is restricted by a more S-shaped ilium. An alternative trajectory was found that has a significantly larger mean diameter in both sexes. Ultimately, the trajectory of hardware will be dictated by the clinical scenario. When large implants are needed, especially in women, we recommend considering the alternative SA corridor.

Keywords: Anterior inferior external fixator; LC2; Osseous fixation pathway; Pelvis; Percutaneous fixation; Supraacetabular.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Haidukewych GJ, Kumar S, Prpa B (2003) Placement of half-pins for supra-acetabular external fixation: an anatomic study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 411:269–273 - DOI
    1. Jung GH, Lee Y, Kim JW (2017) Computational analysis of the safe zone for the antegrade lag screw in posterior column fixation with the anterior approach in acetabular fracture: a cadaveric study. Injury 48:608–614 - DOI
    1. Mears DC, Fu FH (1980) Modern concepts of external skeletal fixation of the pelvis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198009000-00010 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Routt ML, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11:584–589 - DOI
    1. Routt ML, Nork SE, Mills WJ (2000) Percutaneous fixation of pelvic ring disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 375:15–29 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources