Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1988 Apr;81(4):1182-9.
doi: 10.1172/JCI113433.

Electrical and mechanical activity in the human lower esophageal sphincter during diaphragmatic contraction

Affiliations

Electrical and mechanical activity in the human lower esophageal sphincter during diaphragmatic contraction

R K Mittal et al. J Clin Invest. 1988 Apr.

Abstract

To determine the effect of contraction of the diaphragm on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, we studied eight healthy volunteers during spontaneous breathing, maximal inspiration, and graded inspiratory efforts against a closed airway (Muller's maneuver). Electrical activity of the crural diaphragm (DEMG) was recorded from bipolar esophageal electrodes, transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) was calculated as the difference between gastric and esophageal pressures, and LES pressure was recorded using a sleeve device. During spontaneous breathing, phasic inspiratory DEMG was accompanied by phasic increases in Pdi and LES pressure. With maximal inspiration, DEMG increased 15-20-fold compared with spontaneous inspiration, and LES pressure rose from an end-expiratory pressure of 21 to 90 mmHg. Similar values were obtained during maximal Muller's maneuvers. LES pressure fell promptly when the diaphragm relaxed. Graded Muller's maneuver resulted in proportional increases in the Pdi, LES pressure, and DEMG. The LES pressure was always greater than Pdi and correlated with it in a linear fashion (P less than 0.001). We conclude that the contraction of the diaphragm exerts a sphincteric action at the LES, and that this effect is an important component of the antireflux barrier.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gastroenterology. 1972 Mar;62(3):380-8 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Invest. 1980 Feb;65(2):256-67 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol. 1960 Nov;15:1093-7 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1984 May;56(5):1294-301 - PubMed
    1. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1981 Feb;50(2):348-57 - PubMed

Publication types