Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;21(2):e137-e139.
doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2020-0983. Epub 2021 Jan 28.

The safety of anaesthetists and intensivists during the first COVID-19 surge supports extension of use of airborne protection PPE to ward staff

Affiliations

The safety of anaesthetists and intensivists during the first COVID-19 surge supports extension of use of airborne protection PPE to ward staff

Tim M Cook et al. Clin Med (Lond). 2021 Mar.

Abstract

A key controversy in the COVID-19 pandemic has been over staff safety in health and social care settings. Anaesthetists and intensivists were anticipated to be at the highest risk of work-related infection due to involvement in airway management and management of critical illness and therefore wear the highest levels of personal protective equipment (PPE) in the hospital. However, the data clearly show that those working in anaesthesia and critical care settings are at lower risk of infection, harm and death from COVID-19 than colleagues working on the wards. The observed safety of anaesthetists and intensivists and increased risk to those in other patient-facing roles has implications for transmission-based infection control precautions. The precautionary principle supports extending training in and use of airborne precaution PPE to all staff working in patient-facing roles who have close contact with coughing patients. This will both reduce their risk of contracting COVID-19, maintain services and reduce nosocomial transmission to vulnerable patients. The emergence of a new variant of the SARS-CoV-2 virus with significantly higher transmissibility creates urgency to addressing this matter.

Keywords: COVID-19; personal protective equipment; safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thomas JP, Srinivasan A, Wickramarachchi CS, et al. . Evaluating the national PPE guidance for NHS healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Med 2020;20:242–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cook TM. Personal protective equipment during the coronavirus disease (COVID) 2019 pandemic - a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2020;75:920–7. - PubMed
    1. Ueki H, Furusawa Y, Iwatsuki K, et al. . Effectiveness of face masks in preventing airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2. mSphere 2020:5:e00637–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pouwels KB, House T, Robotham JV, et al. . Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey Pilot. www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.06.20147348v1 [Accessed 16 October 2020]. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward H, Cooke G, Atchison C, et al. . Declining prevalence of antibody positivity to SARS-CoV-2: a community study of 365,000 adults. www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.10.26.20219725v1 [Accessed 16 October 2020]. - DOI