Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;64(5):1158-1168.
doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05383-w. Epub 2021 Jan 29.

Heterogeneity in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake among different muscle groups in healthy lean people and people with obesity

Affiliations

Heterogeneity in insulin-stimulated glucose uptake among different muscle groups in healthy lean people and people with obesity

Han-Chow E Koh et al. Diabetologia. 2021 May.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: It has been proposed that muscle fibre type composition and perfusion are key determinants of insulin-stimulated muscle glucose uptake, and alterations in muscle fibre type composition and perfusion contribute to muscle, and consequently whole-body, insulin resistance in people with obesity. The goal of the study was to evaluate the relationships among muscle fibre type composition, perfusion and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake rates in healthy, lean people and people with obesity.

Methods: We measured insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal and glucose uptake and perfusion rates in five major muscle groups (erector spinae, obliques, rectus abdominis, hamstrings, quadriceps) in 15 healthy lean people and 37 people with obesity by using the hyperinsulinaemic-euglycaemic clamp procedure in conjunction with [2H]glucose tracer infusion (to assess whole-body glucose disposal) and positron emission tomography after injections of [15O]H2O (to assess muscle perfusion) and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (to assess muscle glucose uptake). A biopsy from the vastus lateralis was obtained to assess fibre type composition.

Results: We found: (1) a twofold difference in glucose uptake rates among muscles in both the lean and obese groups (rectus abdominis: 67 [51, 78] and 32 [21, 55] μmol kg-1 min-1 in the lean and obese groups, respectively; erector spinae: 134 [103, 160] and 66 [24, 129] μmol kg-1 min-1, respectively; median [IQR]) that was unrelated to perfusion or fibre type composition (assessed in the vastus only); (2) the impairment in insulin action in the obese compared with the lean group was not different among muscle groups; and (3) insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal expressed per kg fat-free mass was linearly related with muscle glucose uptake rate (r2 = 0.65, p < 0.05).

Conclusions/interpretation: Obesity-associated insulin resistance is generalised across all major muscles, and is not caused by alterations in muscle fibre type composition or perfusion. In addition, insulin-stimulated whole-body glucose disposal relative to fat-free mass provides a reliable index of muscle glucose uptake rate.

Keywords: Glucose disposal; Glucose uptake; Insulin resistance; Perfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Insulin-stimulated muscle perfusion (a, b) and glucose uptake (c, d) rates in major muscle groups of the torso and thigh in healthy lean people (n=15, left panels, white bars and symbols) and people with obesity (n=37, right panels, orange bars and symbols). Values are median and interquartile range. * significantly different from erector spinae, hamstrings and quadriceps, p<0.05; significantly different from erector spinae, p<0.05; significantly different from erector spinae and hamstrings, p<0.05;§ significantly different from corresponding values in lean people, p<0.05.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relationship between insulin-stimulated glucose uptake rates in the erector spinae and obliques in healthy lean people (open circles; n=15) and people with obesity (orange filled circles; n=37).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Relationships between insulin-stimulated total muscle glucose uptake (product of muscle mass and average glucose uptake rate in the erector spinae, obliques, rectus abdominis, hamstrings, and quadriceps) and whole-body glucose disposal rate (a), and between the composite average insulin-stimulated glucose uptake rate in the five muscle groups and whole-body glucose disposal rate in relation to body weight (b), and fat-free mass (c) in healthy lean people (open circles; n=15) and people with obesity (orange filled circles; n=37). Dashed lines represent the lines of identity.

References

    1. Roden M, Shulman GI (2019) The integrative biology of type 2 diabetes. Nature 576(7785): 51–60. 10.1038/s41586-019-1797-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D (2009) Skeletal muscle insulin resistance is the primary defect in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 32 Suppl 2: S157–163. 10.2337/dc09-S302 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wasserman DH, Ayala JE (2005) Interaction of physiological mechanisms in control of muscle glucose uptake. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 32(4): 319–323. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2005.04191.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. James DE, Jenkins AB, Kraegen EW (1985) Heterogeneity of insulin action in individual muscles in vivo: euglycemic clamp studies in rats. Am J Physiol 248(5 Pt 1): E567–574. 10.1152/ajpendo.1985.248.5.E567 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Henriksen EJ, Bourey RE, Rodnick KJ, Koranyi L, Permutt MA, Holloszy JO (1990) Glucose transporter protein content and glucose transport capacity in rat skeletal muscles. Am J Physiol 259(4 Pt 1): E593–598 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms