Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 29;19(1):12.
doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00677-2.

Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study

Peter van der Graaf  1 , Mandy Cheetham  2 , Sam Redgate  3 , Clare Humble  3   4 , Ashley Adamson  3
Affiliations

Co-production in local government: process, codification and capacity building of new knowledge in collective reflection spaces. Workshops findings from a UK mixed methods study

Peter van der Graaf et al. Health Res Policy Syst. .

Abstract

Background: Co-production of research evidence is valued by local government to improve effective decision-making about public services in times of austerity. However, underlying structural issues of power (so-called 'dark shadows of co-production') challenge this ambition with limited evidence on how to embed research use sustainably. In this paper we reflect on mechanisms for increasing co-production in local government.

Methods: This paper presents findings from a Health Foundation funded research project that explored how a culture of evidence use to improve population health could be embedded in UK local government. Five linked work packages were undertaken using mixed methods. In this paper, we report the views of UK local authority staff who participated in four workshops (n = 54), informed by a rapid literature review and an online scoping survey.

Results: We identified five themes that facilitate public health evidence use in local government: (1) new governance arrangements to integrate national and local policies, (2) codifying research evidence through local system-wide approaches and (3) ongoing evaluation of programmes, and (4) overcoming political and cultural barriers by increasing absorptive capacity of Local Authorities to embed co-produced knowledge in their cognitive structures. This requires adaptive governance through relationship building between academic researchers and Local Authority staff and shared understanding of fragmented local policy making, which are supported by (5) collective spaces for reflection within local government.

Conclusions: Creating collective spaces for reflection in between government departments allows for iterative, interactive processes of co-production with external partners that support emergence of new governance structures to socially action the co-produced knowledge in context and build capacity for sustained evidence use.

Keywords: Co-production; Embedded research; Knowledge brokering; Public health; Translational research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model of co-production in local government
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Oliver K, Everett M, Verma A, de Vocht F. The human factor: re-organisations in public health policy. Health Policy. 2012;106(1):97–103. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.03.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Powell A, Davies HTO, Nutley SM. Facing the challenges of research-informed knowledge mobilization: practising what we preach? Public Admin. 2018;96(1):36–52. doi: 10.1111/padm.12365. - DOI
    1. Van Der Graaf P, Cheetham M, McCabe K, Rushmer R. Localising and tailoring research evidence helps public health decision making. Health Inf Libr J. 2018;35(3):202–212. doi: 10.1111/hir.12219. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fox C, Gray S, O'Sullivan J. Transforming research and policy: a handbook to connect research with policy. MetroPolis: Manchester Metropolitan University; 2019.
    1. Ferlie E, Fitzgerald L, Wood M. Getting evidence into clinical practice: an organisational behaviour perspective. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000;5(2):96–102. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500207. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources