Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 29;11(1):e043285.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043285.

Comparison of Hospital-at-Home models: a systematic review of reviews

Affiliations

Comparison of Hospital-at-Home models: a systematic review of reviews

Man Qing Leong et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To provide an overview of the safety and effectiveness of Hospital-at-Home (HaH) according to programme type (early-supported discharge (ESD) vs admission avoidance (AA)), and identify the model with higher evidence for addressing clinical, length of stay (LOS) and cost outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review of reviews was conducted by performing a search on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science and Scopus (January 2005 to June 2020) for English-language systematic reviews evaluating HaH. Data on primary outcomes (mortality, readmissions, costs, LOS), secondary outcomes (patient/caregiver outcomes) and process indicators were extracted. Quality of the reviews was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2. There was no registered protocol.

Results: Ten systematic reviews were identified (four high quality, five moderate quality and one low quality). The reviews were classified according to three use cases. ESD reviews generally revealed comparable mortality (RR 0.92-1.03) and readmissions (RR 1.09-1.25) to inpatient care, shorter hospital LOS (MD -6.76 to -4.44 days) and unclear findings for costs. AA reviews observed a trend towards lower mortality (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.09) and costs, and comparable or lower readmissions (RR 0.68-0.98). Among reviews including both programme types (ESD/AA), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease reviews revealed lower mortality (RR 0.65-0.68) and post-HaH readmissions (RR 0.74-0.76) but unclear findings for resource use.

Conclusion: For suitable patients, HaH generally results in similar or improved clinical outcomes compared with inpatient treatment, and warrants greater attention in health systems facing capacity constraints and rising costs. Preliminary comparisons suggest prioritisation of AA models over ESD due to potential benefits in costs and clinical outcomes. Nonetheless, future research should clarify costs of HaH programmes given the current low-quality evidence, as well as address evidence gaps pertaining to caregiver outcomes and adverse events under HaH care.

Keywords: health services administration & management; organisation of health services; quality in health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flow diagram for article selection. PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.

References

    1. de Sousa Vale J, Franco AI, Oliveira CV. Hospital at home: an overview of literature. Home Health Care Manage Pract 2019. 10.1177/1084822319880930 - DOI
    1. Levi B, Borow M, Wapner L, et al. . Home hospitalization worldwide and in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J 2019;21:565–7. - PubMed
    1. Cunningham P, Sammut J. Inadequate acute hospital beds and the limits of primary care and prevention. Emerg Med Australas 2012;24:566–72. 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2012.01601.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sprivulis PC, Da Silva J-A, Jacobs IG, et al. . The association between hospital overcrowding and mortality among patients admitted via Western Australian emergency departments. Med J Aust 2006;184:208–12. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00203.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Richardson DB Increase in patient mortality at 10 days associated with emergency department overcrowding. Med J Aust 2006;184:213–6. 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00204.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types