Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 29;8(1):36.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00806-0.

Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design

Affiliations

Synthetic skull bone defects for automatic patient-specific craniofacial implant design

Jianning Li et al. Sci Data. .

Abstract

Patient-specific craniofacial implants are used to repair skull bone defects after trauma or surgery. Currently, cranial implants are designed and produced by third-party suppliers, which is usually time-consuming and expensive. Recent advances in additive manufacturing made the in-hospital or in-operation-room fabrication of personalized implants feasible. However, the implants are still manufactured by external companies. To facilitate an optimized workflow, fast and automatic implant manufacturing is highly desirable. Data-driven approaches, such as deep learning, show currently great potential towards automatic implant design. However, a considerable amount of data is needed to train such algorithms, which is, especially in the medical domain, often a bottleneck. Therefore, we present CT-imaging data of the craniofacial complex from 24 patients, in which we injected various artificial cranial defects, resulting in 240 data pairs and 240 corresponding implants. Based on this work, automatic implant design and manufacturing processes can be trained. Additionally, the data of this work build a solid base for researchers to work on automatic cranial implant designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Data processing workflow illustrated using Case02. (a) original CT scan; (b) CT cropping; (c) thresholding (HU value ≥ 150) and CT table removal; (d) STL conversion.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of defect injection to a healthy skull (Case02). A healthy skull in 3D (a) and 2D sagittal view (b). The corresponding defective skull in 3D (d) and 2D sagittal view (e). A portion of the skull (shown in gray) is removed (c). The removed portion, i.e., the implant in 3D (f).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Illustration of ten different defects for Case02.

References

    1. Chaurasia, B. D. Human anatomy regional and applied, dissection and clinical volume 3: head, neck and brain (CBS publishers, 2004).
    1. College, O. Anatomy and physiologyl (Rice University, 2013).
    1. Grabowski, T. Principles of anatomy and physiology vol. 2 support and movement. (Biological Sciences Textbooks, 2003).
    1. Ranslow, A. N. et al. Microstructural analysis of porcine skull bone subjected to impact loading (2015).
    1. Bilodi, A. K. & Gangadhar, M. A study on human skulls and its anthropological importance. vol. 3(9), 496–502 (2014).

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources