Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Mar:156:281-293.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group

Collaborators, Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): An update on 107 randomized trials and 19,805 patients, on behalf of MACH-NC Group

Benjamin Lacas et al. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in squamous cell Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) demonstrated that concomitant chemotherapy (CT) improved overall survival (OS) in patients without distant metastasis. We report the updated results.

Materials and methods: Published or unpublished randomized trials including patients with non-metastatic carcinoma randomized between 1965 and 2016 and comparing curative loco-regional treatment (LRT) to LRT + CT or adding another timing of CT to LRT + CT (main question), or comparing induction CT + radiotherapy to radiotherapy + concomitant (or alternating) CT (secondary question) were eligible. Individual patient data were collected and combined using a fixed-effect model. OS was the main endpoint.

Results: For the main question, 101 trials (18951 patients, median follow-up of 6.5 years) were analyzed. For both questions, there were 16 new (2767 patients) and 11 updated trials. Around 90% of the patients had stage III or IV disease. Interaction between treatment effect on OS and the timing of CT was significant (p < 0.0001), the benefit being limited to concomitant CT (HR: 0.83, 95%CI [0.79; 0.86]; 5(10)-year absolute benefit of 6.5% (3.6%)). Efficacy decreased as patients age increased (p_trend = 0.03). OS was not increased by the addition of induction (HR = 0.96 [0.90; 1.01]) or adjuvant CT (1.02 [0.92; 1.13]). Efficacy of induction CT decreased with poorer performance status (p_trend = 0.03). For the secondary question, eight trials (1214 patients) confirmed the superiority of concomitant CT on OS (HR = 0.84 [0.74; 0.95], p = 0.005).

Conclusion: The update of MACH-NC confirms the benefit and superiority of the addition of concomitant CT for non-metastatic head and neck cancer.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Head and Neck Cancer; Individual Patient Data; Meta-analysis; Radiotherapy; Randomised Clinical Trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Efficacy of loco-regional treatment plus chemotherapy versus loco-regional treatment alone by timing of chemotherapy. (A) Overall survival (see web-Figure 2, 10 and 11 for detailed HR plot), (B) Event-free survival. Dotted line and centre of the black diamond are the overall pooled hazard ratio. Horizontal tip of the diamond is the 95% confidence interval. Centre of the squares correspond are the HR of each chemotherapy timing. Area of the square is proportional to the number of deaths in each group of trials. CI: Confidence Interval, CT: Chemotherapy, HR: Hazard Ratio, LRT: Loco-Regional Treatment, O-E: Observed minus Expected.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Overall survival – Survival curves of loco-regional treatment plus chemotherapy and loco-regional treatment alone by timing. (A) Induction chemotherapy, (B) Concomitant chemotherapy, (C) Adjuvant chemotherapy. CI: confidence interval, CT: Chemotherapy, LRT: Loco-Regional Treatment.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Subgroup analyses for loco-regional treatment plus chemotherapy versus loco-regional treatment alone. (A) By performance status for induction chemotherapy, (B) By age for concomitant chemotherapy. CI: Confidence Interval, CT: Chemotherapy, LRT: Loco-Regional Treatment, PS: Performance Status.

References

    1. Pignon J-P, Bourhis J, Domenge C, Designé L. Chemotherapy added to locoregional treatment for head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma: three meta-analyses of updated individual data. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy on Head and Neck Cancer. Lancet 2000;355:949–55. - PubMed
    1. Pignon J-P, le Maître A, Maillard E, Bourhis J. MACH-NC Collaborative Group. Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer (MACH-NC): an update on 93 randomised trials and 17,346 patients. Radiother Oncol 2009;92:4–14. 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.04.014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanchard P, Bourhis J, Lacas B, Posner MR, Vermorken JB, Hernandez JJC, et al.Taxane-cisplatin-fluorouracil as induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers: an individual patient data meta-analysis of the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:2854–60. 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.7802. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dauzier E, Lacas B, Blanchard P, Le Q-T, Simon C, Wolf G, et al.Role of chemotherapy in 5000 patients with head and neck cancer treated by curative surgery: A subgroup analysis of the meta-analysis of chemotherapy in head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2019;95:106–14. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mehanna H, Robinson M, Hartley A, Kong A, Foran B, Fulton-Lieuw T, et al.Radiotherapy plus cisplatin or cetuximab in low-risk human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer (De-ESCALaTE HPV): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2019;393:51–60. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32752-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms