Review: Methanogens and methane production in the digestive systems of nonruminant farm animals
- PMID: 33516013
- DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2020.100060
Review: Methanogens and methane production in the digestive systems of nonruminant farm animals
Abstract
The greenhouse gases (GHGs) derived from agriculture include carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, and methane (CH4). Of these GHGs, CH4, in particular, constitutes a major component of the GHG emitted by the agricultural sector. Along with environmental concerns, CH4 emission also leads to losses in gross energy intake with economic implications. While ruminants are considered the main source of CH4 from agriculture, nonruminant animals also contribute substantially, and the CH4 emission intensity of nonruminants remains comparable to that of ruminants. Means of mitigating CH4 emissions from enteric fermentation have therefore been sought. Methane is produced by methanogens-archaeal microorganisms that inhabit the digestive tracts of animals and participate in fermentation processes. As the diversity of methanogen communities is thought to be responsible for the differences in CH4 production among nonruminant animals, it is necessary to investigate the archaeal composition of specific animal species. Methanogens play an important role in energy metabolism and adipose tissue deposition in animals. Higher abundances of methanogens, along with their higher diversity, have been reported to contribute to lean phenotype in pigs. In particular, a greater abundance of Methanosphaera spp. and early dominance of Methanobrevibacter smithii have been reported to correlate with lower body fat formation in pigs. Besides the contribution of methanogens to the metabolic phenotype of their hosts, CH4 release reduces the productivity that could be achieved through other hydrogen (H2) disposal pathways. Enhanced participation of acetogenesis in H2 disposal, leading to acetate formation, could be a more favorable direction for animal production and the environment. Better knowledge and understanding of the archaeal communities of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), including their metabolism and interactions with other microorganisms, would thus allow the development of new strategies for inhibiting methanogens and shifting toward acetogenesis. There are a variety of approaches to inhibiting methanogens and mitigating methanogenesis in ruminants, which can find an application for nonruminants, such as nutritional changes through supplementation with biologically active compounds and management changes. We summarize the available reports and provide a comprehensive review of methanogens living in the GIT of various nonruminants, such as swine, horses, donkeys, rabbits, and poultry. This review will help in a better understanding of the populations and diversity of methanogens and the implications of their presence in nonruminant animals.
Keywords: Digestive tract; Methanogenesis; Methanogens; Mitigation; Monogastric.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Symposium review: Understanding the role of the rumen microbiome in enteric methane mitigation and productivity in dairy cows.J Dairy Sci. 2022 Oct;105(10):8569-8585. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-21466. Epub 2022 Mar 26. J Dairy Sci. 2022. PMID: 35346473 Review.
-
Review: Fifty years of research on rumen methanogenesis: lessons learned and future challenges for mitigation.Animal. 2020 Mar;14(S1):s2-s16. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003100. Animal. 2020. PMID: 32024560 Review.
-
RUMINANT NUTRITION SYMPOSIUM: Use of genomics and transcriptomics to identify strategies to lower ruminal methanogenesis.J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;93(4):1431-49. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-8329. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26020166
-
The genome sequence of the rumen methanogen Methanobrevibacter ruminantium reveals new possibilities for controlling ruminant methane emissions.PLoS One. 2010 Jan 28;5(1):e8926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008926. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20126622 Free PMC article.
-
Review: Comparative methane production in mammalian herbivores.Animal. 2020 Mar;14(S1):s113-s123. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003161. Animal. 2020. PMID: 32024568 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Compound Chinese Herbal Medicine Additive on Growth Performance and Gut Microbiota Diversity of Zi Goose.Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(21):2942. doi: 10.3390/ani12212942. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36359068 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Quinoa Secondary Metabolites on In Vitro Fermentation and Gas Production.Animals (Basel). 2025 May 23;15(11):1522. doi: 10.3390/ani15111522. Animals (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40508988 Free PMC article.
-
The microbiome of the buffalo digestive tract.Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 10;13(1):823. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28402-9. Nat Commun. 2022. PMID: 35145088 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction of Redox Potential Exerts a Key Role in Modulating Gut Microbial Taxa and Function by Dietary Supplementation of Pectin in a Pig Model.Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Feb 14;11(1):e0328322. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03283-22. Epub 2022 Dec 8. Microbiol Spectr. 2023. PMID: 36475916 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Analyses of Production Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbial Composition between Two Chinese Goose Breeds.Animals (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;12(14):1815. doi: 10.3390/ani12141815. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35883362 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous