Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;42(3):572-578.
doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.11.019. Epub 2020 Nov 29.

Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes

Affiliations

Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes

Ashley Aluko et al. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Research question: Do multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes?

Design: Patients undergoing IVF with homologous single embryo transfer, and who underwent trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between 2013 and 2017, were divided into three groups based on degree of embryonic micromanipulation: once-biopsied, once-cryopreserved (group BC, n = 2603), once-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group CBC, n = 95) and twice-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group BCBC, n = 15). The primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included positive serum pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage.

Results: Group CBC had a significantly lower chance of live birth (adjusted RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.79) and clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85) compared with group BC. Miscarriage rates were similar between groups BC and CBC (adjusted RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.7).

Conclusions: Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Although PGT-A is thought to improve reproductive outcomes on a per transfer basis, caution must be exercised in counselling patients on the possibility of diminishing returns owing to further embryonic micromanipulation after an embryo has been cryopreserved.

Keywords: Biopsy; Cryopreservation; Embryo; PGT-A; Vitrification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest to declare

References

    1. Anon, 2016. Assisted reproductive technology national summary report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
    1. Bradley CK, et al., 2017. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and sterility. 108, 999–1006 - PubMed
    1. Cimadomo D, et al., 2018. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: Prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 33, 1839–1846 - PubMed
    1. Forman EJ, et al., 2014. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the best trial: Single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 210, 157.e1–6 - PubMed
    1. Koch J, et al., 2011. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: A retrospective comparative study. Fertility and sterility. 96, 58–62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources