Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes
- PMID: 33516664
- PMCID: PMC10036156
- DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.11.019
Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes
Abstract
Research question: Do multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes?
Design: Patients undergoing IVF with homologous single embryo transfer, and who underwent trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) between 2013 and 2017, were divided into three groups based on degree of embryonic micromanipulation: once-biopsied, once-cryopreserved (group BC, n = 2603), once-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group CBC, n = 95) and twice-biopsied, twice-cryopreserved (group BCBC, n = 15). The primary outcome was live birth; secondary outcomes included positive serum pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy and miscarriage.
Results: Group CBC had a significantly lower chance of live birth (adjusted RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.79) and clinical pregnancy (adjusted RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.85) compared with group BC. Miscarriage rates were similar between groups BC and CBC (adjusted RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.64 to 2.7).
Conclusions: Multiple cryopreservation-warming cycles, coupled with blastocyst biopsy, negatively affect IVF outcomes. Although PGT-A is thought to improve reproductive outcomes on a per transfer basis, caution must be exercised in counselling patients on the possibility of diminishing returns owing to further embryonic micromanipulation after an embryo has been cryopreserved.
Keywords: Biopsy; Cryopreservation; Embryo; PGT-A; Vitrification.
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
No conflicts of interest to declare
References
-
- Anon, 2016. Assisted reproductive technology national summary report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology.
-
- Bradley CK, et al., 2017. Impact of multiple blastocyst biopsy and vitrification-warming procedures on pregnancy outcomes. Fertility and sterility. 108, 999–1006 - PubMed
-
- Cimadomo D, et al., 2018. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: Prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience. Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 33, 1839–1846 - PubMed
-
- Forman EJ, et al., 2014. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes from the best trial: Single embryo transfer with aneuploidy screening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromising delivery rates. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. 210, 157.e1–6 - PubMed
-
- Koch J, et al., 2011. Twice-frozen embryos are no detriment to pregnancy success: A retrospective comparative study. Fertility and sterility. 96, 58–62 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
