Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May;30(5):1513-1522.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02756-x. Epub 2021 Jan 31.

Development of screening questions for doctor-patient consultation assessing the quality of life and psychosocial burden of glioma patients: an explorative study

Hannah Voß  1 , Peter Scholz-Kreisel  2 , Christoph Richter  1 , Florian Ringel  1 , Susanne Singer  2 , Mirjam Renovanz  3   4
Affiliations

Development of screening questions for doctor-patient consultation assessing the quality of life and psychosocial burden of glioma patients: an explorative study

Hannah Voß et al. Qual Life Res. 2021 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Psychosocial screening for glioma patients is challenging because many patients suffer from neurocognitive deficits, which may impair assessment. This study's aim was to exploratively develop three screening questions for unmet needs to prospectively be applicable in patient-doctor consultation.

Methods: Patient interviews, a survey for health-care professionals and a weighted scoring procedure were developed for this study. Six main areas were defined according to main areas of validated questionnaires (psyche, cognition, body, role functioning, social support, unmet needs). Patients and health-care professionals rated the importance of these areas and corresponding items, patients additionally stated whether the issues addressed affected them.

Results: A total of 50 patients were included, and 36 health-care professionals participated in the online survey. The three areas (psyche, body and cognition) considered to be most relevant by both, health-care professionals and patients, generated three screening questions. If the patient was affected by the issue addressed with a screening question, a subordinate question from that area that our patient sample considered most important could additionally be asked. The elaborated screening questions are the following: (1) main area psyche: "Has your mood worsened?", (2) main area body: "Do physical changes put a strain on you?", and (3) main area cognition: "Has your memory capacity worsened?"

Conclusion: These questions represent a basis for further research regarding their application in neuro-oncological clinical routine.

Keywords: Brain tumor; Distress; Glioma; Neurooncology; Quality of life; Screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and workflow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Weighted scoring procedure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ostrom QT, et al. CBTRUS statistical report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2011–2015. Neuro Oncology. 2018;20(suppl_4):iv1–iv86. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bush NA, Chang SM, Berger MS. Current and future strategies for treatment of glioma. Neurosurgical Review. 2017;40(1):1–14. - PubMed
    1. Jalali R, Dutta D. Factors influencing quality of life in adult patients with primary brain tumors. Neuro Oncology. 2012;14(Suppl 4):iv8–iv16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Janda M, et al. Quality of life among patients with a brain tumor and their carers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2007;63(6):617–623. - PubMed
    1. Shields LB, Choucair A, Choucair AK. Quality of life measures as a preliminary clinical indicator in patients with primary brain tumors. Surgical Neurology International. 2013;4:48. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources