Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 1;13(1):15.
doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-00816-4.

A multilayered post-GWAS assessment on genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

Evangelina López de Maturana #  1   2 Juan Antonio Rodríguez #  3 Lola Alonso  1   2 Oscar Lao  3 Esther Molina-Montes  1   2 Isabel Adoración Martín-Antoniano  1   2 Paulina Gómez-Rubio  1   2 Rita Lawlor  4 Alfredo Carrato  2   5 Manuel Hidalgo  6   7 Mar Iglesias  2   8 Xavier Molero  9   10 Matthias Löhr  11 Christopher Michalski  12   13 José Perea  14 Michael O'Rorke  15   16 Victor Manuel Barberà  17 Adonina Tardón  18   19 Antoni Farré  20 Luís Muñoz-Bellvís  2   21 Tanja Crnogorac-Jurcevic  22 Enrique Domínguez-Muñoz  23 Thomas Gress  24 William Greenhalf  25 Linda Sharp  26   27 Luís Arnes  28   29   30 Lluís Cecchini  2   8 Joaquim Balsells  9   10 Eithne Costello  25 Lucas Ilzarbe  2   8 Jörg Kleeff  12   13 Bo Kong  12 Mirari Márquez  1   2 Josefina Mora  20 Damian O'Driscoll  26 Aldo Scarpa  4 Weimin Ye  31 Jingru Yu  31 PanGenEU InvestigatorsMontserrat García-Closas  32 Manolis Kogevinas  19   33 Nathaniel Rothman  32 Debra T Silverman  32 SBC/EPICURO InvestigatorsDemetrius Albanes  32 Alan A Arslan  34   35   36 Laura Beane-Freeman  32 Paige M Bracci  37 Paul Brennan  38 Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita  39 Julie Buring  40 Federico Canzian  41 Margaret Du  42 Steve Gallinger  43 J Michael Gaziano  44 Phyllis J Goodman  45 Marc Gunter  38 Loic LeMarchand  46 Donghui Li  47 Rachael E Neale  48 Ulrika Peters  49 Gloria M Petersen  50 Harvey A Risch  51 Maria José Sánchez  52   53   54   55 Xiao-Ou Shu  56 Mark D Thornquist  49 Kala Visvanathan  50 Wei Zheng  56 Stephen J Chanock  32 Douglas Easton  57 Brian M Wolpin  58 Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon  32 Alison P Klein  59 Laufey T Amundadottir  60 Marc A Marti-Renom  61 Francisco X Real  2   62   63 Núria Malats  64   65
Affiliations

A multilayered post-GWAS assessment on genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

Evangelina López de Maturana et al. Genome Med. .

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) is a complex disease in which both non-genetic and genetic factors interplay. To date, 40 GWAS hits have been associated with PC risk in individuals of European descent, explaining 4.1% of the phenotypic variance.

Methods: We complemented a new conventional PC GWAS (1D) with genome spatial autocorrelation analysis (2D) permitting to prioritize low frequency variants not detected by GWAS. These were further expanded via Hi-C map (3D) interactions to gain additional insight into the inherited basis of PC. In silico functional analysis of public genomic information allowed prioritization of potentially relevant candidate variants.

Results: We identified several new variants located in genes for which there is experimental evidence of their implication in the biology and function of pancreatic acinar cells. Among them is a novel independent variant in NR5A2 (rs3790840) with a meta-analysis p value = 5.91E-06 in 1D approach and a Local Moran's Index (LMI) = 7.76 in 2D approach. We also identified a multi-hit region in CASC8-a lncRNA associated with pancreatic carcinogenesis-with a lowest p value = 6.91E-05. Importantly, two new PC loci were identified both by 2D and 3D approaches: SIAH3 (LMI = 18.24), CTRB2/BCAR1 (LMI = 6.03), in addition to a chromatin interacting region in XBP1-a major regulator of the ER stress and unfolded protein responses in acinar cells-identified by 3D; all of them with a strong in silico functional support.

Conclusions: This multi-step strategy, combined with an in-depth in silico functional analysis, offers a comprehensive approach to advance the study of PC genetic susceptibility and could be applied to other diseases.

Keywords: 3D genomic structure; Genetic susceptibility; Genome-wide association analysis; Local indices of genome spatial autocorrelation; Pancreatic cancer risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flowchart: overview of the complementary approaches adopted in this study to identify new pancreatic cancer susceptibility regions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Three-dimensional genome organization in healthy and PANC-1 cells and association results corresponding to the genomic region around XBP1 using the standard GWAS and 2D approaches. a Coverage-normalized Hi-C maps of healthy samples and PANC-1 cells at 40 Kb resolution. Green ellipses highlight the interaction between the region harboring four Local Moran’s Index (LMI)-selected SNPs and the XBP1 promoter. b Tracks of the ChromHMM Chromatin for 8 states in healthy pancreas, PANC-1 cells, and a Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia 1B. Promoters are colored in light purple, strong enhancers in dark green, and weak enhancers in yellow. Note that the strong enhancer in the target region is lost in the PANC-1 and PanIN-1B samples, compared to the healthy samples. c UCSC tracks of H3K27ac, an enhancer-associated mark, and arcs linking significant interactions called by HOMER. Interactions in healthy pancreas samples are in green and those in PANC-1 and in the PanIN-1B sample are in purple. Red arc represents the interaction between LMI-prioritized SNPs and the XBP1 promoter (highlighted region in Hi-C map in a). d Scatterplots of SNPs in region chr22:28,400,000-29,600,000 (hg19) and their –log10 (p value), LMI, and odds ratio. Bait and target chromatin interaction regions are highlighted in yellow and blue, respectively
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Zoom plot of the 8q24.21 CASC8 (cancer Susceptibility 8) region and linkage disequilibrium pattern of the PanGenEU GWAS prioritized variants. Red and green points indicate OR < 1 and OR > 1, respectively
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Scatterplots of the –log10 p values, Local Moran’s Index (LMI) values, and odds ratios (OR) for three genomic regions prioritized based on their LMI value. Highlighted regions show the hits identified in the 2D, but not in the 1D approach
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Network of traits in the GWAS Catalog enriched with the genes prioritized in the 1D approach of PanGenEU GWAS. Twelve densely connected subgraphs identified via random walks are displayed in different colors

References

    1. Carrato A, Falcone A, Ducreux M, Valle JW, Parnaby A, Djazouli K, et al. A systematic review of the burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe: real-world impact on survival, quality of life and costs. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2015;46:201–211. doi: 10.1007/s12029-015-9724-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Malvezzi M, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Rota M, Levi F, La Vecchia C, et al. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2015: does lung cancer have the highest death rate in EU women? Ann Oncol. 2015;26:779–786. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A. Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends - an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:16–27. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0578. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rahib L, Smith BD, Aizenberg R, Rosenzweig AB, Fleshman JM, Matrisian LM. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Buniello A, Macarthur JAL, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J, Malangone C, et al. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D1005–D1012. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1120. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances