Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;100(2):643-653.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.092. Epub 2020 Nov 1.

Look at that!-The effect pictures have on consumer preferences for in ovo gender determination as an alternative to culling male chicks

Affiliations

Look at that!-The effect pictures have on consumer preferences for in ovo gender determination as an alternative to culling male chicks

Corrina Reithmayer et al. Poult Sci. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Gender determination in incubated eggs (in ovo) has the potential to substitute the highly discussed practice of culling male layer chicks. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect pictures have on peoples' preferences toward in ovo sexing at different stages of embryonic development and chick culling. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted with a representative sample of 482 respondents in Germany. A within-subject design with 2 choice experiments was used to investigate the influence pictures have on respondents' preferences and willingness to pay. The first-choice experiment contained plain text only; the second contained also pictures of a chick or the incubated eggs at the corresponding stages of development. Findings reveal that in ovo gender determination at each proposed day of incubation (d1, d4, and d9) was preferred to chick culling. In ovo screening on d1 and d4 was significantly preferred to d9. This preference for early gender determination increased significantly as a consequence to the provision of pictures. Results furthermore reveal that a high error rate of gender determination or the lack of a meaningful utilization of incubated eggs can decrease approval for in ovo gender determination to an extent, where no positive willingness to pay remains. Findings of this study are useful for stakeholders in poultry production when considering the implementation of in ovo gender determination as a morally admissible substitute to chick culling.

Keywords: chick; choice experiment; gender determination; in ovo; picture.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a choice set (first choice experiment with text only).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pictures utilized in the choice sets of the second choice experiment. (1Source: Agri Advanced Technologies GmbH, Visbeck, Germany.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example of a choice set (second choice experiment with text and pictures).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aleksandrowicz E., Herr I. Ethical euthanasia and short-term anesthesia of the chick embryo. ALTEX. 2015;32:143–147. - PubMed
    1. Bjørnstad S., Austdal L.P.E., Roald B., Glover J.C., Paulsen R.E. Cracking the egg: potential of the developing chicken as a model system for Nonclinical Safety studies of Pharmaceuticals. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015;355:386–396. - PubMed
    1. Bruijnis M.R.N., Blok V., Stassen E.N., Gremmen H.G.J. “Lock-in” in responsible innovation: the ethical and social aspects of killing day-old chicks and its alternatives. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2015;28:939–960.
    1. Busch G., Gauly S.A., Spiller A. Ich sehe was, was du nicht siehst: Eine Eye-Tracking Studie zur Betrachtung und Bewertung von Bildern aus der Schweinemast. Ger. J. Agr. Econ. 2017;66:65–84.
    1. Busch G., Schwetje C., Spiller A. Bewertung der Tiergerechtheit in der intensiven Hähnchenmast durch Bürger anhand von Bildern: ein Survey Experiment. Ger. J. Agr. Econ. 2015;64:131–147.