Look at that!-The effect pictures have on consumer preferences for in ovo gender determination as an alternative to culling male chicks
- PMID: 33518118
- PMCID: PMC7858000
- DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.09.092
Look at that!-The effect pictures have on consumer preferences for in ovo gender determination as an alternative to culling male chicks
Abstract
Gender determination in incubated eggs (in ovo) has the potential to substitute the highly discussed practice of culling male layer chicks. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect pictures have on peoples' preferences toward in ovo sexing at different stages of embryonic development and chick culling. For this purpose, an online survey was conducted with a representative sample of 482 respondents in Germany. A within-subject design with 2 choice experiments was used to investigate the influence pictures have on respondents' preferences and willingness to pay. The first-choice experiment contained plain text only; the second contained also pictures of a chick or the incubated eggs at the corresponding stages of development. Findings reveal that in ovo gender determination at each proposed day of incubation (d1, d4, and d9) was preferred to chick culling. In ovo screening on d1 and d4 was significantly preferred to d9. This preference for early gender determination increased significantly as a consequence to the provision of pictures. Results furthermore reveal that a high error rate of gender determination or the lack of a meaningful utilization of incubated eggs can decrease approval for in ovo gender determination to an extent, where no positive willingness to pay remains. Findings of this study are useful for stakeholders in poultry production when considering the implementation of in ovo gender determination as a morally admissible substitute to chick culling.
Keywords: chick; choice experiment; gender determination; in ovo; picture.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Need for an Alternative to Culling Day-Old Male Layer Chicks: A Survey on Awareness, Alternatives, and the Willingness to Pay for Alternatives in a Selected Population of Dutch Citizens.Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 17;8:662197. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.662197. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34222395 Free PMC article.
-
Consumer preferences for alternatives to chick culling in Germany.Poult Sci. 2019 Oct 1;98(10):4539-4548. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez272. Poult Sci. 2019. PMID: 31162613
-
Swiss consumers' willingness to pay and attitudes regarding dual-purpose poultry and eggs.Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):1089-1098. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex397. Poult Sci. 2018. PMID: 29351665
-
A review of the recent advances for the in ovo sexing of chicken embryos using optical sensing techniques.Poult Sci. 2023 Oct;102(10):102906. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2023.102906. Epub 2023 Jun 28. Poult Sci. 2023. PMID: 37480656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current approaches to avoid the culling of day-old male chicks in the layer industry, with special reference to spectroscopic methods.Poult Sci. 2018 Mar 1;97(3):749-757. doi: 10.3382/ps/pex389. Poult Sci. 2018. PMID: 29294120 Review.
Cited by
-
Multi-omics analysis of yolk and allantoic fluid in chicken embryonic development and sexual differentiation.Poult Sci. 2025 Aug;104(8):105349. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105349. Epub 2025 May 28. Poult Sci. 2025. PMID: 40494175 Free PMC article.
-
The Need for an Alternative to Culling Day-Old Male Layer Chicks: A Survey on Awareness, Alternatives, and the Willingness to Pay for Alternatives in a Selected Population of Dutch Citizens.Front Vet Sci. 2021 Jun 17;8:662197. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.662197. eCollection 2021. Front Vet Sci. 2021. PMID: 34222395 Free PMC article.
-
Nociception in Chicken Embryos, Part I: Analysis of Cardiovascular Responses to a Mechanical Noxious Stimulus.Animals (Basel). 2023 Aug 25;13(17):2710. doi: 10.3390/ani13172710. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37684974 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Aleksandrowicz E., Herr I. Ethical euthanasia and short-term anesthesia of the chick embryo. ALTEX. 2015;32:143–147. - PubMed
-
- Bjørnstad S., Austdal L.P.E., Roald B., Glover J.C., Paulsen R.E. Cracking the egg: potential of the developing chicken as a model system for Nonclinical Safety studies of Pharmaceuticals. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2015;355:386–396. - PubMed
-
- Bruijnis M.R.N., Blok V., Stassen E.N., Gremmen H.G.J. “Lock-in” in responsible innovation: the ethical and social aspects of killing day-old chicks and its alternatives. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics. 2015;28:939–960.
-
- Busch G., Gauly S.A., Spiller A. Ich sehe was, was du nicht siehst: Eine Eye-Tracking Studie zur Betrachtung und Bewertung von Bildern aus der Schweinemast. Ger. J. Agr. Econ. 2017;66:65–84.
-
- Busch G., Schwetje C., Spiller A. Bewertung der Tiergerechtheit in der intensiven Hähnchenmast durch Bürger anhand von Bildern: ein Survey Experiment. Ger. J. Agr. Econ. 2015;64:131–147.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources