Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;100(3):100933.
doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.12.030. Epub 2021 Jan 15.

Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens

Milan K Sharma  1 , Dima White  2 , Chongxiao Chen  2 , Woo K Kim  2 , Pratima Adhikari  3
Affiliations

Effects of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur bone properties of different laying phases of Hy-Line hens

Milan K Sharma et al. Poult Sci. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of the housing environment and laying hen strain on tibia and femur properties. A 3 × 2 factorial arrangement of 3 housing environments (conventional cages [CC], enriched colony cages [EC], and free range [FR]) and 2 laying hen strains (Hy-Line W-36 [W-36] and Hy-Line Brown [HB]) in a completely randomized design was conducted from 32 to 85 wk of age. Six left tibias were collected at 8 different time points (38, 45, 52, 59, 65, 72, 79, and 85 wk of age), whereas 6 left femurs were collected at 3 time points (38, 65, and 85 wk of age). Tibias were evaluated for tibia breaking strength (TBS) and ash percentage, whereas femurs were evaluated for bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content, bone volume as a fraction tissue volume, and porosity percentage from total, cortical, medullary, and trabecular bones. The higher TBS (P = 0.0005) and ash percentage (P = 0.045) was observed in hens raised in FR systems compared with those raised in the CC. Overall, TBS of W-36 hens was significantly greater than that of HB hens (P < 0.0001); however, there was no difference in the ash percentage between the strains (P > 0.05). An interaction between the housing environment and hen strain was observed for BMD (P = 0.04), wherein W-36 hens raised in the FR system had higher BMD than HB hens. Similarly, hens raised in FR systems had higher trabecular bone volume than those raised in CC (P = 0.022). Hen strain influenced total and cortical bone properties: BMD, bone volume as a fraction tissue volume, and porosity percentage, wherein W-36 hens had better properties than HB hens (P < 0.05). Trabecular BMD was higher in W-36 hens than in HB hens (P = 0.04), whereas bone volume was higher in HB hens (P < 0.0001). The results suggest that raising laying hens in alternative housing systems that have provision for exercise such as FR reduces structural bone loss, stimulate structural bone formation, and improve breaking strength of bones; however, it varies with the strain.

Keywords: X-ray microtomography; bone property; housing environment; laying hen strain.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Appleby M.C. The EU ban on battery cages: history and prospects. State Anim. 2003;2003:159–174.
    1. Asabe . 2005. Shear and Three-point Bending Test of Animal Bone. Test 1992, ANSI/ASAE S459, USA.
    1. Belanger L. F. 1963. Resorption without osteoclasts (osteolysis). In Symposium on Mechanism of Hard Tissue Destruction. Pages 531–556 in Amer. Assoc. Adv. Sci., R. F. Sognnaes, ed. Washington, DC.
    1. Bishop S.C., Fleming R.H., Mccormagk H.A., Flock D.K., Whitehead C.C. Inheritance of bone characteristics affecting osteoporosis in laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000;41:33–40. - PubMed
    1. Bloom M.A., Domm L.V., Nalbandov A.V., Bloom W. Medullary bone of laying chickens. A. J. Anat. 1958;102:411–453. - PubMed