Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 31;11(1):e040387.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040387.

Prescribing pattern of antipsychotic medication for first-episode psychosis: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Prescribing pattern of antipsychotic medication for first-episode psychosis: a retrospective cohort study

Dolores Keating et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Guidelines for antipsychotic use in first-episode psychosis (FEP) recommend that medication be chosen initially on the basis of side effect profile with doses at the lower end of the range. Our objective was to describe the pattern of antipsychotic use in FEP over a period of 21 years in the context of changing clinical guidelines and the development of specialist early intervention in psychosis (EIP) services.

Setting: A community-based mental health service in South County Dublin (population 187 000) and a large private hospital.

Participants: Participants included 465 patients with FEP (146 from an epidemiological study (1995-1999) and 319 from a specialist EIP service (2005-2016)). Treatment with antipsychotic medication did not exceed 30 days at study entry.

Outcome measures: This is a descriptive study of prescribing practices in the context of service development and changing guidelines.

Results: First-generation antipsychotics were prescribed for 65% of the early cohort compared with 4.3% of the EIP cohort. Olanzapine was initially prescribed for 79.7% of EIP patients. Initial doses of medication were frequently low (≤50% British National Formulary (BNF) maximum) in both cohorts (71% and 78.6%). The demographic and clinical factors investigated did not influence the initial choice of antipsychotic medication significantly. Univariate logistic regression analysis suggested inpatient treatment setting was associated with a higher initial dose (>50% BNF maximum) of antipsychotic medication. Increasing dose requirements over the first month of engagement with an EIP service was associated with poorer global functioning at baseline, greater positive symptoms at baseline and the inpatient treatment setting. However, these associations were not seen in the multivariable model.

Conclusions: Second-generation antipsychotic prescribing predominates, but guidelines are often overlooked when choosing olanzapine notwithstanding lower initial dosages. EIP services should include proactive support for optimising medicines in line with evidence-based guidelines.

Keywords: adult psychiatry; protocols & guidelines; schizophrenia & psychotic disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Description of cohorts of patients presenting to an early intervention service, time frame of presentation, inclusion criteria, demographic and medication-related variables. aDuration of untreated psychosis. bStructured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. cPositive and Negative Syndrome Scale. dGlobal Assessment of Functioning. eScale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. fScale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms. EIP, early intervention in psychosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of olanzapine (%) prescribed per year for patients presenting for assessment of first-episode psychosis. Guidelines published in 2009 advising against the use of olanzapine as an initial medication in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and widening the choice to first or second-generation antipsychotics (orange line).

References

    1. Correll CU, Galling B, Pawar A, et al. . Comparison of early intervention services vs treatment as usual for early-phase psychosis: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. JAMA Psychiatry 2018;75:555–65. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.0623 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Albert N, Melau M, Jensen H, et al. . Five years of specialised early intervention versus two years of specialised early intervention followed by three years of standard treatment for patients with a first episode psychosis: randomised, superiority, parallel group trial in Denmark (OPUS II). BMJ 2017;356:i6681. 10.1136/bmj.i6681 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Craig TKJ, Garety P, Power P, et al. . The Lambeth early onset (Leo) team: randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of specialised care for early psychosis. BMJ 2004;329:1067. 10.1136/bmj.38246.594873.7C - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behan C, Masterson S, Clarke M. Systematic review of the evidence for service models delivering early intervention in psychosis outside the stand-alone centre. Early Interv Psychiatry 2017;11:3–13. 10.1111/eip.12334 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aceituno D, Vera N, Prina AM, et al. . Cost-Effectiveness of early intervention in psychosis: systematic review. Br J Psychiatry 2019;215:388–94. 10.1192/bjp.2018.298 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources