Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 12:2021:8829686.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8829686. eCollection 2021.

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large Single-Centre Experience

Affiliations

Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Unprotected Left Main Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Large Single-Centre Experience

Lijian Gao et al. J Interv Cardiol. .

Abstract

Aims: This study sought to report the 10-year clinical outcomes of patients who underwent unprotected left main (LM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in a large centre.

Methods and results: A total of 913 consecutive patients who underwent unprotected LM PCI from January 2004 to December 2008 at Fu Wai Hospital were retrospectively analysed; the mean age was 60.0 ± 10.9 years, females accounted for 22% of patients, diabetes was present in 27.7% of patients, and an LM bifurcation lesion occurred in 82.9% of patients. During the median follow-up of 9.7 years, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) occurred in 25.6% (234) of patients, and the rates of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and stroke were 14.9%, 11.0%, and 7.1%, respectively. Cardiac death occurred in only 7.9% of patients. The estimated event rate was 41.9% for death/myocardial infarction/any revascularization and 45.9% for death/MI/stroke/any revascularization. Definite/probable stent thrombosis occurred in 4.3% (39) of patients. According to the subgroup analysis, IVUS-guided PCI was associated with less long-term MACCEs. Further multivariate analysis identified that age and LVEF<40% were the only independent predictors for 10-year death. Age, LVEF<40%, creatinine clearance, and incomplete revascularization were independent predictors for death/MI, while a two-stent strategy, diabetes, a transradial approach, and the use of bare metal stents (BMSs) or first-generation drug-eluting stents (DESs) were not.

Conclusions: Unprotected LM PCI in a large cohort of consecutive patients in a single large centre demonstrated favourable long-term outcomes up to 10 years even with the use of BMSs and first-generation of DESs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in regards to this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient flow. PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; LM = left main.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Long-term efficiency and safety after LM PCI. (a) Kaplan–Meier curves for death, cardiac death, MI, and stroke events; (b) Kaplan–Meier curves for composite events including death/MI and death/MI/stroke. MI = myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
10-year target lesion revascularization and target-vessel revascularization. Annual target lesion revascularization (a) and target-vessel revascularization (b) event rates.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Survival curves of 10-year death/MI/stroke events among subgroups. The surgical exclusion population included patients meeting any one of the following criteria: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <35%, age >70, acute myocardial infarction with haemodynamic instability, creatinine clearance <50, or bleeding history within 6 months. BMS = bare metal stent; DES = drug-eluting stent; and IVUS = intravascular ultrasound. Other abbreviations are as in Figure 2.

References

    1. Stone G. W., Sabik J. F., Serruys P. W., et al. Everolimus eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. New England Journal of Medicine. 2016;375(23):2223–2235. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1610227. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mäkikallio T., Holm N. R., Lindsay M., et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2016;388(10061):2743–2752. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32052-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F., et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Kardiologia Polska. 2014;72:1253–1379. doi: 10.5603/kp.2014.0224. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fihn S. D., Blankenship J. C., Alexander K. P. ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on practice guidelines, and the American association for thoracic surgery, preventive cardiovascular nurses association, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, and society of thoracic surgeons. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2014;64:1929–1949. - PubMed
    1. Burzotta F., Lassen J. F., Banning A. P., et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: the 13th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(1):112–120. doi: 10.4244/eij-d-18-00357. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources