Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan 16;13(1):13-23.
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v13.i1.13.

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided coils plus cyanoacrylate injection compared to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in the management of gastric varices

Carlos Robles-Medranda  1 , Joao Autran Nebel  2 , Miguel Puga-Tejada  2 , Roberto Oleas  2 , Jorge Baquerizo-Burgos  2 , Jesenia Ospina-Arboleda  2 , Manuel Valero  2 , Hannah Pitanga-Lukashok  2
Affiliations

Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided coils plus cyanoacrylate injection compared to endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in the management of gastric varices

Carlos Robles-Medranda et al. World J Gastrointest Endosc. .

Abstract

Background: Cyanoacrylate (CYA) injection can be performed using a standard upper endoscopy technique or under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guidance alone or in combination with coils. There is little information available on the economic impact of these treatment methods.

Aim: To compare the cost-effectiveness of treating gastric varices by CYA injection via upper endoscopy vs coils plus CYA guided by EUS.

Methods: This was an observational, descriptive, and retrospective study. Patients were allocated into two groups: A CYA group and coils plus CYA group. The baseline characteristics were compared, and a cost analysis was performed.

Results: Overall, 36 patients were included (19 in the CYA group and 17 in the coils + CYA group). All patients in the CYA group had acute bleeding. They underwent a higher mean number of procedures (1.47 vs 1, P = 0.025), and the mean volume of glue used was 2.15 vs 1.65 mL, P = 0.133. The coils + CYA group showed a higher technical success rate (100% vs 84.2%), with a complication rate similar to the CYA group. The majority of CYA patients required hospitalization, and although the mean total per procedure cost was lower (United States $ 1350.29 vs United States $ 2978), the mean total treatment cost was significantly different (United States $ 11060.89 for CYA vs United States $ 3007.13 for coils + CYA, P = 0.03).

Conclusion: The use of EUS-guided coils plus cyanoacrylate is more cost-effective than cyanoacrylate injection when the total costs are evaluated. Larger, randomized trials are needed to validate the cost-effectiveness of the EUS-guided approach to treat gastric varices.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapy; Gastric varices; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Hemostasis; Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: Carlos Robles-Medranda is a key opinion leader and consultant for Pentax Medical, Boston Scientific, G-tech medical supply and MD consulting group. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flowchart. CYA: Cyanoacrylate; GOV: Gastroesophageal varices; IGV: Isolated gastric varices; USD: United States dollar.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endoscopic view of actively bleeding type II gastroesophageal varices treated with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided coiling plus cyanoacrylate injection for the management of gastric varices. A: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-Doppler evaluation of the gastric varix feeder vessel; B: EUS-guided fine-needle puncture and cyanoacrylate injection; C: Fluoroscopic view of EUS-guided coiling of gastric varices; D: EUS-Doppler demonstrating absence of flow after combined therapy.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The Incremental Cost-Effective ratio equation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sarin SK, Jain AK, Jain M, Gupta R. A randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate versus alcohol injection in patients with isolated fundic varices. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1010–1015. - PubMed
    1. Greig JD, Garden OJ, Anderson JR, Carter DC. Management of gastric variceal haemorrhage. Br J Surg. 1990;77:297–299. - PubMed
    1. Ríos Castellanos E, Seron P, Gisbert JP, Bonfill Cosp X. Endoscopic injection of cyanoacrylate glue versus other endoscopic procedures for acute bleeding gastric varices in people with portal hypertension. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. :2015: CD010180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kok K, Bond RP, Duncan IC, Fourie PA, Ziady C, van den Bogaerde JB, van der Merwe SW. Distal embolization and local vessel wall ulceration after gastric variceal obliteration with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate: a case report and review of the literature. Endoscopy. 2004;36:442–446. - PubMed
    1. Bhat YM, Weilert F, Fredrick RT, Kane SD, Shah JN, Hamerski CM, Binmoeller KF. EUS-guided treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined injection of coils and cyanoacrylate glue: a large U.S. experience over 6 years (with video) Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:1164–1172. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources